Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
The Right to Contraception Act creates a statutory right for individuals to obtain contraceptives and for health care providers to provide contraception, related information, and referrals. It broadly preempts Federal and State laws that would prohibit or restrict contraceptive sale, provision, or use, limits defenses for such restrictions, and preserves FDA authority.
Progressives emphasize rights and preemption to protect access
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified substantive rights statute that provides clear definitions, broad preemption, and concrete judicial enforcement mechanisms to protect access to contraception nationwide.
The Right to Contraception Act creates a statutory right for individuals to obtain contraceptives and for health care providers to provide contraception, related information, and referrals.
It broadly preempts Federal and State laws that would prohibit or restrict contraceptive sale, provision, or use, limits defenses for such restrictions, and preserves FDA authority.
The Act allows the Attorney General and private parties to sue violators, authorizes equitable relief and attorneys’ fees for prevailing plaintiffs, and waives state sovereign immunity for enforcement actions.
Substantive national preemption on a contentious topic with private enforcement and immunity waivers lowers prospects absent strong bipartisan compromise.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified substantive rights statute that provides clear definitions, broad preemption, and concrete judicial enforcement mechanisms to protect access to contraception nationwide.
Progressives emphasize rights and preemption to protect access
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize rights and preemption to protect access
Likely strongly supportive; views the bill as a necessary federal safeguard preserving reproductive autonomy and preventing state-level restrictions.
Sees private enforcement and abrogation of state immunity as essential tools to ensure access where states restrict care.
Generally supportive but cautious; appreciates national clarity protecting contraceptive access while worrying about federalism, litigation volume, and interactions with insurance law.
Would look for clearer cost and implementation provisions.
Likely strongly opposed; views the bill as federal overreach that preempts state authority and constrains religious and conscience protections.
Opposes waiver of state sovereign immunity and broad private right of action.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Substantive national preemption on a contentious topic with private enforcement and immunity waivers lowers prospects absent strong bipartisan compromise.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize rights and preemption to protect access
Substantive national preemption on a contentious topic with private enforcement and immunity waivers lowers prospects absent strong biparti…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified substantive rights statute that provides clear definitions, broad preemption, and concrete judicial enforcement mechanisms to protect access to co…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.