Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
This bill amends 18 U.S.C. §1030 (the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act) to expressly include attempts and conspiracies in the covered offenses and penalties. It inserts language such as "or a conspiracy" and "conspires to cause, attempts to cause" in multiple subsections, enabling prosecution of conspiratorial and attempted computer-fraud-related conduct under the statute.
Left worries civil liberties and research chill; right emphasizes stronger enforcement.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill has a clear and narrowly focused substantive aim (extending liability to conspiracies/attempts under 18 U.S.C. §1030) but is hampered by unclear and fragmented amendment text and by omission of several drafting and implementation details that would be reasonably expected for a criminal-law statute change.
This bill amends 18 U.S.C. §1030 (the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act) to expressly include attempts and conspiracies in the covered offenses and penalties.
It inserts language such as "or a conspiracy" and "conspires to cause, attempts to cause" in multiple subsections, enabling prosecution of conspiratorial and attempted computer-fraud-related conduct under the statute.
Narrow, low-cost change that fits routine statutory cleanup, but criminalization expansion invites civil‑liberties and sentencing scrutiny, lowering chances.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill has a clear and narrowly focused substantive aim (extending liability to conspiracies/attempts under 18 U.S.C. §1030) but is hampered by unclear and fragmented amendment text and by omission of several drafting and implementation details that would be reasonably expected for a criminal-law statute change.
Left worries civil liberties and research chill; right emphasizes stronger enforcement.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Left worries civil liberties and research chill; right emphasizes stronger enforcement.
Would see a legitimate law-enforcement aim in targeting organized cybercriminal conspiracies but be wary of expanding criminal liability.
Concerned about chilling effects on security research, vague pre-criminal liability, and unequal enforcement without safeguards.
Likely cautiously supportive because it strengthens tools against cybercrime while recognizing need for precision.
Would want clearer definitions and safeguards to avoid unintended prosecutions and to limit compliance and enforcement costs.
Generally favorable as a pragmatic strengthening of law enforcement capability against cybercriminal networks.
Views the change as closing a gap that lets conspirators avoid accountability, while seeing civil-liberty risks as manageable.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, low-cost change that fits routine statutory cleanup, but criminalization expansion invites civil‑liberties and sentencing scrutiny, lowering chances.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Left worries civil liberties and research chill; right emphasizes stronger enforcement.
Narrow, low-cost change that fits routine statutory cleanup, but criminalization expansion invites civil‑liberties and sentencing scrutiny,…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill has a clear and narrowly focused substantive aim (extending liability to conspiracies/attempts under 18 U.S.C. §1030) but is hampered by unclear and fragmented amendm…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.