Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
This bill amends the Mineral Leasing Act to remove an existing administrative fee provision that reduced certain mineral lease receipts. It makes conforming statutory edits to the Mineral Leasing Act, the Acquired Lands leasing provisions, the Geothermal Steam Act, and the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act to reflect that removal.
Progressives emphasize climate and oversight funding concerns
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped substantive amendment that correctly targets and integrates with existing statutes through explicit citation and amendment language, but the provided text contains incomplete replacement fragments and omits implementation, fiscal, transitional, and oversight details that would typically accompany a change that affects revenue flows and administrative practice.
This bill amends the Mineral Leasing Act to remove an existing administrative fee provision that reduced certain mineral lease receipts.
It makes conforming statutory edits to the Mineral Leasing Act, the Acquired Lands leasing provisions, the Geothermal Steam Act, and the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act to reflect that removal.
The net legal effect is to stop deducting that administrative fee from disbursements governed by the amended provisions.
Small, technical change that benefits state receipts and industry; historically such narrow revenue-sharing fixes have reasonable chance if unopposed.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped substantive amendment that correctly targets and integrates with existing statutes through explicit citation and amendment language, but the provided text contains incomplete replacement fragments and omits implementation, fiscal, transitional, and oversight details that would typically accompany a change that affects revenue flows and administrative practice.
Progressives emphasize climate and oversight funding concerns
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize climate and oversight funding concerns
Skeptical.
While restoring state receipts can help local budgets, this change likely benefits fossil fuel producers and state budgets from extraction.
Concern centers on climate incentives and possible reduction in federal oversight funding.
Cautiously favorable if technical and fiscally neutral.
The bill appears to correct statutory mechanics returning receipts to states, but it raises legitimate questions about federal administrative funding and budget offsets.
Support hinges on clarity about fiscal impacts and program integrity.
Strongly supportive.
The bill reduces federal take, restores state revenues, and limits administrative deductions.
It aligns with state control and reduced federal interference in energy revenue distribution.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Small, technical change that benefits state receipts and industry; historically such narrow revenue-sharing fixes have reasonable chance if unopposed.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize climate and oversight funding concerns
Small, technical change that benefits state receipts and industry; historically such narrow revenue-sharing fixes have reasonable chance if…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped substantive amendment that correctly targets and integrates with existing statutes through explicit citation and amendment language, but the prov…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.