Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S794-795)
Establishes a joint Wildfire Intelligence Center housed across USDA, Commerce, and Interior to aggregate data, model fire behavior, provide real-time decision-support, consolidate air-quality and risk information, and coordinate federal, state, Tribal, and private partners. The Center will be governed by a 14-member board of career agency employees, have an Executive Director with contracting authority, develop data standards and interoperable IT, pick a headquarters within one year, and use interagency financing with limited transfer-notification requirements.
Scope: centralized federal role versus state/local control
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured administrative/operational statute that establishes a joint interagency office with detailed functions, governance, and some authorities for contracting and interagency financing.
Establishes a joint Wildfire Intelligence Center housed across USDA, Commerce, and Interior to aggregate data, model fire behavior, provide real-time decision-support, consolidate air-quality and risk information, and coordinate federal, state, Tribal, and private partners.
The Center will be governed by a 14-member board of career agency employees, have an Executive Director with contracting authority, develop data standards and interoperable IT, pick a headquarters within one year, and use interagency financing with limited transfer-notification requirements.
Technically focused, low political heat, and administratively feasible; implementation hinges on funding, committee buy‑in, and overlap concerns.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured administrative/operational statute that establishes a joint interagency office with detailed functions, governance, and some authorities for contracting and interagency financing. It provides substantial functional specificity and clear assignment of appointing authorities for the Board.
Scope: centralized federal role versus state/local control
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Scope: centralized federal role versus state/local control
Generally supportive because the bill centralizes science, data sharing, Tribal partnership, and public-health oriented smoke forecasting.
Views the Center as a needed federal response to worsening fire regimes and ecosystem change.
May push for robust funding, community equity, and limits on privatization of core functions.
Supportive but pragmatic: likes coordination, data standards, and operational decision-support, while worrying about duplication, measurable outcomes, and budgetary discipline.
Wants clear performance metrics, oversight, and phased implementation to avoid mission creep.
Skeptical due to creation of a new federal interagency office, potential duplication of NOAA/USGS/Forest Service roles, and expanded federal influence over local land and emergency decisions.
Concerned about costs, federal overreach, and data-sharing implications for private landowners.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technically focused, low political heat, and administratively feasible; implementation hinges on funding, committee buy‑in, and overlap concerns.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Scope: centralized federal role versus state/local control
Technically focused, low political heat, and administratively feasible; implementation hinges on funding, committee buy‑in, and overlap con…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured administrative/operational statute that establishes a joint interagency office with detailed functions, governance, and some authorities for cont…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.