Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
This bill amends the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Act of 2004 to add the State of Utah as an additional Institute under that Act. It modifies Section 5(b)(2) and makes a conforming change to Section 5(e)(1) to list Utah alongside other states.
All agree on potential benefits; debate centers on funding and implementation
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill performs a focused statutory amendment to add the State of Utah as an Institute under the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Act of 2004, and it includes a conforming amendment to an adjacent provision.
This bill amends the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Act of 2004 to add the State of Utah as an additional Institute under that Act.
It modifies Section 5(b)(2) and makes a conforming change to Section 5(e)(1) to list Utah alongside other states.
The text does not authorize specific funding, implementation details, or timelines.
Content is narrowly targeted and non-controversial, improving chances; nevertheless it must navigate committee and appropriations processes and secure funding.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill performs a focused statutory amendment to add the State of Utah as an Institute under the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Act of 2004, and it includes a conforming amendment to an adjacent provision.
All agree on potential benefits; debate centers on funding and implementation
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
All agree on potential benefits; debate centers on funding and implementation
Likely supportive because expanded wildfire research can advance climate adaptation, community resilience, and science-based forest management.
Concerned that the bill contains no funding, community or tribal engagement requirements, or equity safeguards, so outcomes are uncertain.
Generally favorable as an incremental, low-drama expansion of an existing program to address a clear state need.
Will seek cost estimates, implementation clarity, and measures to avoid duplication with existing federal or state efforts.
Cautious but inclined to support if framed as state benefit and practical preparedness.
Wary of expanding federal bureaucracy or new regulatory burdens and skeptical if it implies increased federal spending without offsets.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrowly targeted and non-controversial, improving chances; nevertheless it must navigate committee and appropriations processes and secure funding.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
All agree on potential benefits; debate centers on funding and implementation
Content is narrowly targeted and non-controversial, improving chances; nevertheless it must navigate committee and appropriations processes…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill performs a focused statutory amendment to add the State of Utah as an Institute under the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Act of 2004, and it includes…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.