S. 464 (119th)Bill Overview

No CBDC Act

Finance and Financial Sector|Finance and Financial Sector
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Feb 6, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill amends the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit Federal Reserve banks, the Board, the Treasury, or related agencies from minting or issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) directly to individuals or digital currency intermediaries, offering related products or services directly to individuals, or maintaining accounts for individuals (including via custodial intermediaries). It also bars Federal Reserve banks from holding U.S.-issued digital currencies on their balance sheets or using them to satisfy requirements under section 2A.

Why people may split

Liberals focus on loss of public tools for inclusion; conservatives on preventing government overreach.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory prohibition amending the Federal Reserve Act to bar Federal Reserve and certain government actors from issuing or holding a central bank digital currency and from maintaining accounts for individuals, but it is minimalist in legislative drafting detail.

The bill amends the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit Federal Reserve banks, the Board, the Treasury, or related agencies from minting or issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) directly to individuals or digital currency intermediaries, offering related products or services directly to individuals, or maintaining accounts for individuals (including via custodial intermediaries).

It also bars Federal Reserve banks from holding U.S.-issued digital currencies on their balance sheets or using them to satisfy requirements under section 2A.

Passage30/100

Short, targeted prohibition has partisan appeal but little built-in compromise and could attract executive and regulator pushback; historically such constraints rarely become law.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory prohibition amending the Federal Reserve Act to bar Federal Reserve and certain government actors from issuing or holding a central bank digital currency and from maintaining accounts for individuals, but it is minimalist in legislative drafting detail.

Contention72/100

Liberals focus on loss of public tools for inclusion; conservatives on preventing government overreach.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
ConsumersFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • ConsumersPreserves consumer privacy by prohibiting a central bank from holding individual accounts or transacting directly with…
  • Potential benefitMaintains commercial banks' role as intermediaries, potentially protecting banking-sector deposits and related jobs.
  • Potential benefitReduces concentration of operational and cybersecurity risk at the central bank by forbidding retail CBDC issuance.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesRestricts Federal Reserve tools that could deliver rapid payments or direct fiscal transfers during emergencies.
  • Potential burdenMay slow modernization of the national payments infrastructure and associated cost savings.
  • Potential burdenCould hinder financial inclusion efforts that rely on universally accessible digital central bank accounts.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals focus on loss of public tools for inclusion; conservatives on preventing government overreach.
Progressive25%

Likely opposed overall because the bill preemptively removes a public monetary tool that could advance financial inclusion and public-interest payment innovations.

They would worry the ban forecloses policy options to regulate or counteract private crypto concentration, though privacy concerns about a poorly designed CBDC are acknowledged.

Likely resistant
Centrist50%

Mixed stance: appreciates preventing a rushed CBDC deployment and guarding privacy, but worries a categorical ban removes an option for careful, evidence-based pilots.

Would prefer clearer legislative guardrails instead of an absolute prohibition.

Split reaction
Conservative90%

Likely strongly supportive because the bill restricts federal power and prevents the Federal Reserve or Treasury from creating direct individual accounts or a government-controlled digital currency.

Seen as protecting individual liberty and preserving private banking.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood30/100

Short, targeted prohibition has partisan appeal but little built-in compromise and could attract executive and regulator pushback; historically such constraints rarely become law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No statutory definition of 'central bank digital currency' in the text
  • Absent cost or administrative impact estimate (CBO/agency analysis)
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals focus on loss of public tools for inclusion; conservatives on preventing government overreach.

Short, targeted prohibition has partisan appeal but little built-in compromise and could attract executive and regulator pushback; historic…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory prohibition amending the Federal Reserve Act to bar Federal Reserve and certain government actors from issuing or holding a central bank digita…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis