Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Creates a new federal offense criminalizing knowingly transmitting the location, movement, or activities of law enforcement to further certain federal border-related crimes, and criminalizing destruction or evasion of border fences, sensors, cameras, or other devices. Sets penalties up to 10 years imprisonment, or up to 20 years if a firearm is used or possessed; makes attempts and conspiracies punishable the same.
Progressives emphasize civil liberties and humanitarian exemptions.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions primarily as a substantive criminal law change: it creates new offenses, prescribes penalties, and makes multiple conforming amendments into the Immigration and Nationality Act and Title 18.
Creates a new federal offense criminalizing knowingly transmitting the location, movement, or activities of law enforcement to further certain federal border-related crimes, and criminalizing destruction or evasion of border fences, sensors, cameras, or other devices.
Sets penalties up to 10 years imprisonment, or up to 20 years if a firearm is used or possessed; makes attempts and conspiracies punishable the same.
Amends 18 U.S.C. 924(c) to treat specified alien-smuggling and drug trafficking felonies as covered offenses, adjusts related statutory cross-references, and expands statute-of-limitations coverage to include the new offense.
Technocratic criminal-law changes help chance, but high political salience, civil liberties pushback, and Senate threshold lower overall odds.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions primarily as a substantive criminal law change: it creates new offenses, prescribes penalties, and makes multiple conforming amendments into the Immigration and Nationality Act and Title 18. The text integrates with existing law and supplies concrete statutory language for the new offenses and related criminal provisions.
Progressives emphasize civil liberties and humanitarian exemptions.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize civil liberties and humanitarian exemptions.
Likely cautious or skeptical.
Supportive of reducing transnational criminal activity but concerned the definitions are broad and could chill journalists, humanitarian workers, legal observers, or protesters.
Worries about expanded criminal penalties and civil liberties implications without explicit exemptions or oversight.
Generally supportive of stronger tools against transnational criminal organizations, but concerned about vague terms and unintended effects.
Would seek narrower drafting, targeted exemptions, and clear definitions to avoid overcriminalization and preserve legitimate civil activity.
Likely broadly favorable.
Views the bill as strengthening border security, deterring alien smuggling, and punishing those who aid transnational criminal organizations or sabotage border controls.
Sees firearm-related enhancements as appropriate for violent or organized crimes.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technocratic criminal-law changes help chance, but high political salience, civil liberties pushback, and Senate threshold lower overall odds.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize civil liberties and humanitarian exemptions.
Technocratic criminal-law changes help chance, but high political salience, civil liberties pushback, and Senate threshold lower overall od…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions primarily as a substantive criminal law change: it creates new offenses, prescribes penalties, and makes multiple conforming amendments into the Immigration…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.