S. 524 (119th)Bill Overview

Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2025

Transportation and Public Works|Administrative law and regulatory proceduresAdvisory bodies
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Feb 11, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Held at the Desk

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill is a multi-title Coast Guard Authorization Act that: authorizes appropriations and end-strength levels for fiscal years 2025–2026; updates acquisition and procurement authorities and reporting requirements; establishes personnel, health, family-leave, and housing policies; requires multiple studies and briefings; expands maritime safety, surveillance, and counter-drug authorities; directs coordination and training with partners (including Taiwan); creates property, tribal, and cooperative-use authorities; and contains extensive sexual assault, harassment, and accountability reforms and NOAA-related provisions.

Why people may split

Surveillance procurement: civil-liberty worries vs. security-first rationale.

Watch point

Broad technical bill with spending and some foreign-policy elements; House consideration may face amendment activity and scrutiny over specific riders.

This bill is a multi-title Coast Guard Authorization Act that: authorizes appropriations and end-strength levels for fiscal years 2025–2026; updates acquisition and procurement authorities and reporting requirements; establishes personnel, health, family-leave, and housing policies; requires multiple studies and briefings; expands maritime safety, surveillance, and counter-drug authorities; directs coordination and training with partners (including Taiwan); creates property, tribal, and cooperative-use authorities; and contains extensive sexual assault, harassment, and accountability reforms and NOAA-related provisions.

Passage45/100

Substantive but familiar authorization package—technocratic majority of measures aid passage; complexity, cost, and a few sensitive provisions reduce probability absent negotiation.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention32/100

Surveillance procurement: civil-liberty worries vs. security-first rationale.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
CitiesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitProvides higher Coast Guard funding levels for FY2025–2026, supporting operations and acquisitions.
  • CitiesRaises authorized military end‑strength and certain training billets, potentially improving operational capacity.
  • Potential benefitStreamlines select acquisition pathways and life‑cycle cost consideration, potentially lowering long‑term maintenance c…
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenExpanded procurement exemptions and LSI definitions may increase acquisition risk, cost overruns, and reduced competiti…
  • Potential burdenTreating appropriated funds as non‑appropriated for morale funds could reduce congressional control over those expendit…
  • Potential burdenNew surveillance procurements and data sharing raise privacy, civil‑liberties, and homeland‑security data‑handling conc…
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Surveillance procurement: civil-liberty worries vs. security-first rationale.
Progressive78%

Generally supportive of stronger personnel, health, family-leave, and survivor protections in the bill, while cautious about expanded surveillance and acquisition exemptions.

Values provisions improving behavioral health, naloxone availability, sexual misconduct reforms, and tribal/cooperative resource protections.

Concerned about transparency, civil liberties, and potential cost overruns from procurement changes.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Largely favorable because the bill funds operations, improves personnel support, and strengthens oversight via required reports.

Appreciates the mix of operational, personnel, and accountability measures.

Cautious about fiscal cost, procurement exceptions, and any provisions that might undercut congressional oversight.

Leans supportive
Conservative92%

Strongly favorable on enhanced maritime security, counter-drug measures, Taiwan training cooperation, and acquisition flexibility to speed shipyard and drydock procurement.

Appreciates increased appropriations for readiness and personnel.

Wants assurance of efficient procurement and national security review for tech deployments.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Substantive but familiar authorization package—technocratic majority of measures aid passage; complexity, cost, and a few sensitive provisions reduce probability absent negotiation.

Scope and complexity
86%
Scopesweeping
86%
Complexityhigh
Why this could stall
  • Whether appropriations will match authorized spending levels
  • Interagency and international legal reviews for vessel‑seizure and Taiwan training
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Surveillance procurement: civil-liberty worries vs. security-first rationale.

Substantive but familiar authorization package—technocratic majority of measures aid passage; complexity, cost, and a few sensitive provisi…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2025.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis