- Federal agenciesReduces compliance costs for lenders by eliminating federal data collection obligations.
- CommunitiesLowers administrative burdens particularly for community banks and credit unions.
- Potential benefitPotentially speeds loan processing by removing reporting requirements and associated workflows.
1071 Repeal to Protect Small Business Lending Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
This bill repeals Section 704B of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (commonly known as Dodd-Frank section 1071), removing federal small-business loan data collection and reporting requirements. It also makes conforming deletions from the Dodd-Frank Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act tables of contents.
Progressives emphasize loss of anti-discrimination data and transparency
Narrow deregulatory bill is procedurally simple and may attract support from lenders, but faces organized opposition from civil‑rights and consumer groups.
This bill repeals Section 704B of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (commonly known as Dodd-Frank section 1071), removing federal small-business loan data collection and reporting requirements.
It also makes conforming deletions from the Dodd-Frank Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act tables of contents.
The sponsor’s findings state these requirements imposed compliance costs and disproportionately burdened smaller financial institutions.
Content is narrow and administratively simple, which helps, but partisan tradeoffs and civil‑rights/consumer opposition lower prospects, especially in a Senate requiring supermajority.
How solid the drafting looks.
Progressives emphasize loss of anti-discrimination data and transparency
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Potential burdenRemoves a data source used to detect discriminatory or disparate lending practices.
- Small businessesReduces transparency for regulators, researchers, and policymakers studying small business credit access.
- Potential burdenMay make it harder to measure outcomes for minority-owned and women-owned businesses.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Progressives emphasize loss of anti-discrimination data and transparency
Likely opposed: views Section 1071 as a tool to detect discrimination and promote lending transparency.
Repeal is seen as removing oversight without evidence that harms are reduced.
Mixed/conditional: recognizes compliance costs but worries about losing oversight data.
Prefers targeted, evidence-based fixes rather than immediate full repeal.
Generally supportive: views repeal as pro-growth deregulatory step that reduces burdens on community lenders and encourages small-business credit availability.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow and administratively simple, which helps, but partisan tradeoffs and civil‑rights/consumer opposition lower prospects, especially in a Senate requiring supermajority.
- Absent CBO cost estimate and formal agency impact analysis
- Level and cohesion of opposition from consumer and civil‑rights groups
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Progressives emphasize loss of anti-discrimination data and transparency
Content is narrow and administratively simple, which helps, but partisan tradeoffs and civil‑rights/consumer opposition lower prospects, es…
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for 1071 Repeal to Protect Small Business Lending Act.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.