Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
The One Subject at a Time Act requires each bill or joint resolution to deal with only one subject, and that the subject be clearly and descriptively stated in the title. It bars appropriations bills from containing general legislation or changes to existing law not germane to the appropriations subject, while allowing spending limitations.
Liberals worry judicial nullification of omnibus progressive laws
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and direct statutory approach to limit legislation to a single subject and to authorize judicial enforcement.
The One Subject at a Time Act requires each bill or joint resolution to deal with only one subject, and that the subject be clearly and descriptively stated in the title.
It bars appropriations bills from containing general legislation or changes to existing law not germane to the appropriations subject, while allowing spending limitations.
Enforcement provisions void multi‑subject titles or off‑topic provisions, permit any aggrieved person or Member to sue under 28 U.S.C. §§2201–2202, and set a de novo standard of judicial review.
Far-reaching procedural reform with weak compromise features and broad private enforcement likely to provoke resistance and legal challenges.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and direct statutory approach to limit legislation to a single subject and to authorize judicial enforcement. It specifies substantive legal consequences and a private right of action, but leaves several interpretive and practical implementation details undefined.
Liberals worry judicial nullification of omnibus progressive laws
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals worry judicial nullification of omnibus progressive laws
Supports transparency and limiting backroom riders but worries this will judicially nullify omnibus legislation used to pass large progressive packages.
Concerned about private lawsuits and de novo review that could be used to block social, environmental, and civil rights measures.
Sees value in clearer, single‑subject bills for accountability but worries about practicality and increased litigation.
Likely to seek precise definitions and procedural fixes to avoid gridlock and excessive court involvement.
Favors the bill as a tool to stop backdoor policy riders and restore legislative accountability.
Views the private cause of action and voiding rules as effective enforcement to prevent spending and policy graft.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Far-reaching procedural reform with weak compromise features and broad private enforcement likely to provoke resistance and legal challenges.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals worry judicial nullification of omnibus progressive laws
Far-reaching procedural reform with weak compromise features and broad private enforcement likely to provoke resistance and legal challenge…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and direct statutory approach to limit legislation to a single subject and to authorize judicial enforcement. It specifies substantive legal consequences a…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.