S. 675 (119th)Bill Overview

Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library Museum Artifacts Act

Arts, Culture, Religion|Arts, Culture, Religion
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
Feb 20, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to provide up to $50 million in grants, subject to appropriation, toward establishing the Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library in Medora, North Dakota. Grants are conditional on the Foundation certifying at least $100 million raised from state or non‑Federal sources, and grant funds may not be used for maintenance or operation.

Why people may split

Liberals emphasize exhibit context and public‑interest priorities

Watch point

Narrow, place-based spending with matching requirement reduces federal cost; some members may oppose earmarks or specific local benefits.

The bill authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to provide up to $50 million in grants, subject to appropriation, toward establishing the Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library in Medora, North Dakota.

Grants are conditional on the Foundation certifying at least $100 million raised from state or non‑Federal sources, and grant funds may not be used for maintenance or operation.

The Secretary may, within 180 days of enactment, enter agreements to loan Federal artifacts and objects to the Foundation without monetary consideration, under terms the Secretary finds necessary.

Passage40/100

Modest cost, strong match requirement, and narrow purpose make it plausible, but passage depends on appropriations and any objections to directed spending.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention25/100

Liberals emphasize exhibit context and public‑interest priorities

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governments · Federal agenciesLocal governments · States

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Local governmentsMay attract visitors, increasing local tourism and related jobs in Medora and surrounding areas.
  • Federal agenciesMakes federal artifacts available for public display, improving preservation and access to Theodore Roosevelt materials.
  • Federal agenciesLeverages Federal funds to incentivize private and State fundraising for a major cultural project.
Likely burdened
  • Local governmentsDirects Federal funding and federal artifacts to a single local institution, raising equity and precedent concerns.
  • StatesProhibition on using grant funds for maintenance shifts ongoing operating costs to State or private parties.
  • Federal agenciesLoaning artifacts to a non-Federal operator could create stewardship and preservation oversight gaps.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize exhibit context and public‑interest priorities
Progressive70%

Likely cautiously supportive of preserving Theodore Roosevelt's conservation and public‑education legacy but wary of new federal spending on a presidential library.

Will want assurances about inclusive, historically contextualized exhibits and protections for public access and scientific integrity.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally supportive of limited, conditional federal seed funding that leverages state and private contributions.

Will focus on fiscal safeguards, clarity of artifact loan terms, and preventing future unfunded federal obligations.

Leans supportive
Conservative85%

Likely favorable because the bill emphasizes private/state fundraising, limits federal spending, and forbids federal operation of the Library.

Supports honoring a former president and local economic benefits while keeping Federal role minimal.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Modest cost, strong match requirement, and narrow purpose make it plausible, but passage depends on appropriations and any objections to directed spending.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Timing and availability of appropriations funding
  • Whether the Foundation can raise the $100M non‑federal match
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize exhibit context and public‑interest priorities

Modest cost, strong match requirement, and narrow purpose make it plausible, but passage depends on appropriations and any objections to di…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library Museum Artifacts Act.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis