- Local governmentsEnables local ownership to develop facilities specifically serving veterans.
- Federal agenciesTransfers long-term maintenance and management responsibility from federal government to county.
- Local governmentsMay expedite local projects by removing certain federal administrative hurdles.
A bill to require the Secretary of Agriculture to convey the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site to Gila County, Arizona.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
This bill directs the Secretary of Agriculture to convey approximately 232.9 acres of National Forest System land in the Pleasant Valley Ranger District, Tonto National Forest, to Gila County, Arizona, if the county requests conveyance within 180 days. The conveyance would be by quitclaim deed, without consideration, subject to valid existing rights, county payment of conveyance costs (surveys, environmental and historic analyses), no federal CERCLA covenant, and a use restriction requiring the land be used only to serve and support veterans, with reversion to the United States for inconsistent uses.
Progressives worry about public-land loss and contamination liability
Local, narrowly targeted bill with veterans benefit; likely amenable to expedited or voice-vote consideration, subject to committee schedule.
This bill directs the Secretary of Agriculture to convey approximately 232.9 acres of National Forest System land in the Pleasant Valley Ranger District, Tonto National Forest, to Gila County, Arizona, if the county requests conveyance within 180 days.
The conveyance would be by quitclaim deed, without consideration, subject to valid existing rights, county payment of conveyance costs (surveys, environmental and historic analyses), no federal CERCLA covenant, and a use restriction requiring the land be used only to serve and support veterans, with reversion to the United States for inconsistent uses.
Narrow, noncontroversial conveyance for veterans with cost protections aligns with many previously enacted local land-transfer bills; main risks are procedural delays.
How solid the drafting looks.
Progressives worry about public-land loss and contamination liability
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Federal agenciesRemoves federal land from National Forest protection and future federal management.
- CountiesShifts environmental and potential contamination liability and compliance costs to the county.
- Local governmentsCounty must pay all conveyance and compliance costs, imposing fiscal burden on local government.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Progressives worry about public-land loss and contamination liability
Generally supportive of projects serving veterans but cautious about transferring public forest land to local governments.
Concerned about environmental, cultural, and public-access implications, and the absence of federal CERCLA warranty.
Practical approval: transfers surplus federal property to local government for a clear public purpose.
Wants clear surveys, environmental review, and predictable oversight to limit future disputes.
Strongly favorable: transfers federal land to local control, supports veterans, and reduces federal management responsibilities.
Views cost-shifting to county as prudent and local governance preferable.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, noncontroversial conveyance for veterans with cost protections aligns with many previously enacted local land-transfer bills; main risks are procedural delays.
- Absence of a CBO cost estimate in the bill text
- Whether environmental contamination or liabilities exist on the parcel
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Progressives worry about public-land loss and contamination liability
Narrow, noncontroversial conveyance for veterans with cost protections aligns with many previously enacted local land-transfer bills; main…
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for A bill to require the Secretary of Agriculture to convey the P…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.