S. 712 (119th)Bill Overview

Regulation Decimation Act

Government Operations and Politics|Administrative law and regulatory proceduresCongressional oversight
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Feb 25, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The Regulation Decimation Act requires federal agencies to repeal ten existing regulations that are, to the extent practicable, related before issuing a new rule. For major rules, agencies must repeal ten related rules and the new rule’s cost must be certified by OIRA as less than or equal to the repealed rules' cost.

Why people may split

Liberals emphasize lost protections and benefit neglect

Watch point

Broad, ideological reforms often face substantial floor amendment fights; could pass if a clear majority coalesces, otherwise contested.

The Regulation Decimation Act requires federal agencies to repeal ten existing regulations that are, to the extent practicable, related before issuing a new rule.

For major rules, agencies must repeal ten related rules and the new rule’s cost must be certified by OIRA as less than or equal to the repealed rules' cost.

Repealed rules must be published in the Federal Register; agencies must report within 90 days on costly or duplicative rules, and the President must report after five years on rule counts and reductions.

Passage20/100

Wide-reaching, ideologically charged constraints on rulemaking are hard to enact absent broad bipartisan consent or inclusion in a larger must-pass vehicle.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention75/100

Liberals emphasize lost protections and benefit neglect

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitReduces overall regulatory burdens and compliance costs for businesses and nonprofits.
  • Potential benefitEncourages removal of outdated, duplicative, or ineffective rules across agencies.
  • Federal agenciesIncreases transparency via required agency reviews and Federal Register publication of repeals.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenRisks creating regulatory gaps if necessary protections are repealed to enable new rules.
  • Potential burdenMay block or delay issuance of public-health, safety, or environmental protections.
  • Potential burdenCould hinder agencies from meeting statutory obligations when repeal prerequisites are unattainable.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize lost protections and benefit neglect
Progressive10%

This persona would view the bill as a structural constrain on agency ability to protect public health, environment, and civil rights.

They would be concerned the 10-for-1 requirement and cost-only test ignore benefits and could force repeal of essential safeguards.

Likely resistant
Centrist45%

This persona would acknowledge the value of pruning needless regulation and improving agency review, but find the 10-for-1 numeric requirement arbitrary.

They would want safeguards to preserve responsiveness and to evaluate benefits, not just costs.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

This persona would view the bill positively as a strong constraint on regulatory growth and an accountability mechanism forcing agencies to eliminate outdated rules.

They would welcome OIRA certification and publication requirements, while wanting clarity on implementation.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood20/100

Wide-reaching, ideologically charged constraints on rulemaking are hard to enact absent broad bipartisan consent or inclusion in a larger must-pass vehicle.

Scope and complexity
86%
Scopesweeping
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • How ‘‘related’’ rules are legally defined and counted
  • Methodology for cost comparisons and OIRA certification standards
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize lost protections and benefit neglect

Wide-reaching, ideologically charged constraints on rulemaking are hard to enact absent broad bipartisan consent or inclusion in a larger m…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Regulation Decimation Act.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis