- Potential benefitReduces overall regulatory burdens and compliance costs for businesses and nonprofits.
- Potential benefitEncourages removal of outdated, duplicative, or ineffective rules across agencies.
- Federal agenciesIncreases transparency via required agency reviews and Federal Register publication of repeals.
Regulation Decimation Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
The Regulation Decimation Act requires federal agencies to repeal ten existing regulations that are, to the extent practicable, related before issuing a new rule. For major rules, agencies must repeal ten related rules and the new rule’s cost must be certified by OIRA as less than or equal to the repealed rules' cost.
Liberals emphasize lost protections and benefit neglect
Broad, ideological reforms often face substantial floor amendment fights; could pass if a clear majority coalesces, otherwise contested.
The Regulation Decimation Act requires federal agencies to repeal ten existing regulations that are, to the extent practicable, related before issuing a new rule.
For major rules, agencies must repeal ten related rules and the new rule’s cost must be certified by OIRA as less than or equal to the repealed rules' cost.
Repealed rules must be published in the Federal Register; agencies must report within 90 days on costly or duplicative rules, and the President must report after five years on rule counts and reductions.
Wide-reaching, ideologically charged constraints on rulemaking are hard to enact absent broad bipartisan consent or inclusion in a larger must-pass vehicle.
How solid the drafting looks.
Liberals emphasize lost protections and benefit neglect
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Potential burdenRisks creating regulatory gaps if necessary protections are repealed to enable new rules.
- Potential burdenMay block or delay issuance of public-health, safety, or environmental protections.
- Potential burdenCould hinder agencies from meeting statutory obligations when repeal prerequisites are unattainable.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Liberals emphasize lost protections and benefit neglect
This persona would view the bill as a structural constrain on agency ability to protect public health, environment, and civil rights.
They would be concerned the 10-for-1 requirement and cost-only test ignore benefits and could force repeal of essential safeguards.
This persona would acknowledge the value of pruning needless regulation and improving agency review, but find the 10-for-1 numeric requirement arbitrary.
They would want safeguards to preserve responsiveness and to evaluate benefits, not just costs.
This persona would view the bill positively as a strong constraint on regulatory growth and an accountability mechanism forcing agencies to eliminate outdated rules.
They would welcome OIRA certification and publication requirements, while wanting clarity on implementation.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Wide-reaching, ideologically charged constraints on rulemaking are hard to enact absent broad bipartisan consent or inclusion in a larger must-pass vehicle.
- How ‘‘related’’ rules are legally defined and counted
- Methodology for cost comparisons and OIRA certification standards
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Liberals emphasize lost protections and benefit neglect
Wide-reaching, ideologically charged constraints on rulemaking are hard to enact absent broad bipartisan consent or inclusion in a larger m…
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Regulation Decimation Act.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.