Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
The bill extends special duty-free treatment for qualifying Haitian apparel imports under section 213A of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act through September 30, 2035. It codifies an ‘‘applicable percentage’’ of 60 percent (effective Dec 20, 2017), limits preferential treatment to not more than 1.25% of aggregate square meter equivalents of U.S. apparel imports each year, and requires the President to modify the Harmonized Tariff Schedule to restore certain articles that lost eligibility after December 20, 2006.
Support for Haiti development versus protecting U.S. textile jobs
Narrow trade tweak with modest budget effects, but may face textile-industry scrutiny and floor scheduling limits.
The bill extends special duty-free treatment for qualifying Haitian apparel imports under section 213A of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act through September 30, 2035.
It codifies an ‘‘applicable percentage’’ of 60 percent (effective Dec 20, 2017), limits preferential treatment to not more than 1.25% of aggregate square meter equivalents of U.S. apparel imports each year, and requires the President to modify the Harmonized Tariff Schedule to restore certain articles that lost eligibility after December 20, 2006.
A presidential proclamation restoring eligibility takes effect no earlier than two business days after reporting to the House and Senate tax/finance committees.
Narrow, administrable trade preference extension with caps and a sunset; historically similar measures often pass, especially if attached to broader trade package.
How solid the drafting looks.
Support for Haiti development versus protecting U.S. textile jobs
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Support for Haiti development versus protecting U.S. textile jobs
Likely broadly supportive because the bill advances economic opportunity and stability in Haiti through trade preferences.
They will favor the extension as a development tool but want stronger labor, human rights, and anti-corruption safeguards and monitoring (impact estimates are uncertain).
Pragmatic support is likely if accompanied by oversight and enforcement provisions.
The bill’s cap and finite extension mitigate risk, but centrists will want clear reporting and assessment of impacts on U.S. industry and Haitian development.
Mixed to somewhat skeptical: some conservatives may back trade preferences as strategic foreign policy, but many will worry about market distortion and harm to U.S. textile workers.
Support depends on strong enforcement and limited domestic disruption.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, administrable trade preference extension with caps and a sunset; historically similar measures often pass, especially if attached to broader trade package.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Support for Haiti development versus protecting U.S. textile jobs
Narrow, administrable trade preference extension with caps and a sunset; historically similar measures often pass, especially if attached t…
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Haiti Economic Lift Program Extension Act of 2025.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.