Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
This bill establishes the Justice Thurgood Marshall National Historic Site in Baltimore, Maryland, as an affiliated area of the National Park System. The site is the former Public School 103, owned and operated by the Beloved Community Services Corporation, which will remain the management entity.
Liberals want stronger federal funding and program commitments.
Narrow, locally focused, low-cost design typically attracts bipartisan support, but still requires committee and floor scheduling.
This bill establishes the Justice Thurgood Marshall National Historic Site in Baltimore, Maryland, as an affiliated area of the National Park System.
The site is the former Public School 103, owned and operated by the Beloved Community Services Corporation, which will remain the management entity.
The Secretary of the Interior may provide technical assistance and enter cooperative agreements but may not acquire the school or assume overall financial responsibility.
Very limited scope, low controversy, and explicit limits on federal cost increase odds, but procedural hurdles and unspecified funding add uncertainty.
How solid the drafting looks.
Liberals want stronger federal funding and program commitments.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals want stronger federal funding and program commitments.
Likely strongly supportive because the bill preserves and interprets Thurgood Marshall’s legacy and advances civil rights history.
Appreciates national recognition and NPS partnership, but may push for clearer, dedicated funding and public programming commitments.
Concerned that limiting federal financial responsibility could jeopardize sustainability.
Generally favorable: the bill protects a historically significant site while avoiding federal acquisition and major new bureaucracy.
Views the affiliated-area model as a pragmatic compromise.
Wants clear cooperative-agreement terms and transparent costs before full endorsement.
Cautiously supportive of honoring Thurgood Marshall but wary of federal precedent and spending.
The bill’s retention of local ownership and prohibition on federal acquisition reduces opposition.
Concerned about potential mission creep or later funding obligations.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Very limited scope, low controversy, and explicit limits on federal cost increase odds, but procedural hurdles and unspecified funding add uncertainty.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals want stronger federal funding and program commitments.
Very limited scope, low controversy, and explicit limits on federal cost increase odds, but procedural hurdles and unspecified funding add…
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Justice Thurgood Marshall National Historic Site Establishment…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.