Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
The bill adds a new chapter to Title 14 authorizing automatic appropriations to continue pay and certain benefits for Coast Guard military members, qualified civilian employees, and qualified contractors during a Coast Guard-specific funding lapse. A "Coast Guard-specific funding lapse" is defined as when Coast Guard appropriations are not enacted but Department of Defense appropriations are in effect.
Liberal emphasizes protecting service members and families
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear, narrowly tailored substantive change that creates an automatic appropriation authority to continue Coast Guard pay and certain benefits during a defined appropriations lapse scenario and integrates that authority into existing statutory pay frameworks.
The bill adds a new chapter to Title 14 authorizing automatic appropriations to continue pay and certain benefits for Coast Guard military members, qualified civilian employees, and qualified contractors during a Coast Guard-specific funding lapse.
A "Coast Guard-specific funding lapse" is defined as when Coast Guard appropriations are not enacted but Department of Defense appropriations are in effect.
The authority covers pay, death gratuities, certain travel and housing allowance continuations, charges expenditures to future appropriations, and gives the Commandant discretion to designate qualified civilians and contractors.
Technocratic, narrow relief for uniformed personnel increases support; procedural and budget-process concerns temper certainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear, narrowly tailored substantive change that creates an automatic appropriation authority to continue Coast Guard pay and certain benefits during a defined appropriations lapse scenario and integrates that authority into existing statutory pay frameworks.
Liberal emphasizes protecting service members and families
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberal emphasizes protecting service members and families
Generally strongly supportive.
The persona will view the bill as closing an inequitable gap that could harm service members and their families during funding gaps.
They will welcome the protections for pay, death benefits, and housing continuity while wanting broader civilian protections and transparency.
Generally supportive but cautious.
Sees the bill as a narrow, pragmatic fix to prevent service disruptions and personnel harm, while wanting clear limits, fiscal transparency, and mechanisms to avoid creating undesirable precedents.
Mixed to somewhat opposed.
Acknowledges importance of Coast Guard pay continuity, but worries the bill circumvents the appropriations process and expands executive discretion to obligate funds without explicit Congressional appropriation.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technocratic, narrow relief for uniformed personnel increases support; procedural and budget-process concerns temper certainty.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberal emphasizes protecting service members and families
Technocratic, narrow relief for uniformed personnel increases support; procedural and budget-process concerns temper certainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear, narrowly tailored substantive change that creates an automatic appropriation authority to continue Coast Guard pay and certain benefits during a…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.