S. 805 (119th)Bill Overview

Combating International Islamophobia Act

International Affairs|International Affairs
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Feb 27, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill creates an Office to Monitor and Combat Islamophobia inside the State Department, led by a Special Envoy. The Office will monitor Islamophobic acts and incitement abroad, consult NGOs and multilateral bodies, and help prepare specified portions of existing annual human rights and international religious freedom reports describing Islamophobia.

Why people may split

Definition and scope of 'Islamophobia' and protection versus free speech

Watch point

Administrative, limited cost but potential ideological objections to religion-specific envoy and perceived redundancy could produce opposition in the House.

The bill creates an Office to Monitor and Combat Islamophobia inside the State Department, led by a Special Envoy.

The Office will monitor Islamophobic acts and incitement abroad, consult NGOs and multilateral bodies, and help prepare specified portions of existing annual human rights and international religious freedom reports describing Islamophobia.

The bill prescribes timelines for establishment (120 days) and for report-inclusion changes (effective 180 days) and allows the Special Envoy to be appointed from current State Department staff.

Passage45/100

Relatively narrow, administrative bill with low fiscal impact increases odds, but religion-focused framing and potential redundancy create moderate obstacles.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention66/100

Definition and scope of 'Islamophobia' and protection versus free speech

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedStates

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitImproves documentation of anti-Muslim violence, harassment, and propaganda internationally.
  • Potential benefitCreates a diplomatic focal point to coordinate responses and engage NGOs and multilateral bodies.
  • Potential benefitLikely increases pressure on foreign governments to enact protections and promote anti-bias education.
Likely burdened
  • StatesAdds administrative and reporting burdens to State Department staff and overseas missions.
  • Potential burdenMay duplicate or overlap existing offices monitoring religious freedom or hate-based issues.
  • Potential burdenCould generate diplomatic friction with countries criticized in the new report sections.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Definition and scope of 'Islamophobia' and protection versus free speech
Progressive90%

Likely broadly supportive because the measure directs diplomatic attention to anti-Muslim discrimination and integrates Islamophobia into human rights reporting.

Supporters will view this as advancing religious freedom and minority protections internationally, while noting the need for adequate resources and clear implementation.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Cautious, generally favorable view: monitoring and reporting on religiously motivated violence fits existing human rights work.

The centrist perspective will seek clarity on terms, resource implications, and diplomatic consequences, favoring narrowly tailored implementation.

Split reaction
Conservative30%

Skeptical overall: protecting religious minorities abroad is acceptable, but this bill expands bureaucracy and could impinge on free expression or complicate diplomacy.

Conservatives will worry about vague terms, politicization, and unfunded mandates.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Relatively narrow, administrative bill with low fiscal impact increases odds, but religion-focused framing and potential redundancy create moderate obstacles.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No authorization of appropriations or staffing levels provided
  • Possible overlap with existing State Department offices and reports
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Definition and scope of 'Islamophobia' and protection versus free speech

Relatively narrow, administrative bill with low fiscal impact increases odds, but religion-focused framing and potential redundancy create…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Combating International Islamophobia Act.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis