S. 809 (119th)Bill Overview

Saving Privacy Act

Finance and Financial Sector|Finance and Financial Sector
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Feb 27, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill tightens statutory privacy protections for financial records, dramatically narrows certain Bank Secrecy Act authorities, and raises penalties for improper disclosures. It requires termination of the Consolidated Audit Trail, bars a Federal Reserve-issued retail CBDC, restricts agency rulemaking via a REINS-style review, and protects use of convertible virtual currency and self-hosted wallets.

Why people may split

Privacy protections versus retention of AML and law enforcement tools

Watch point

Broad, ideological package likely to attract vocal support and opposition; may pass a chamber favoring deregulatory priorities but faces intra‑chamber tradeoffs.

The bill tightens statutory privacy protections for financial records, dramatically narrows certain Bank Secrecy Act authorities, and raises penalties for improper disclosures.

It requires termination of the Consolidated Audit Trail, bars a Federal Reserve-issued retail CBDC, restricts agency rulemaking via a REINS-style review, and protects use of convertible virtual currency and self-hosted wallets.

The bill also reforms third-party payment reporting thresholds and creates civil and criminal remedies for unlawful access to financial records.

Passage20/100

Comprehensive deregulatory and anti‑agency reforms across sensitive policy areas make enactment unlikely absent major narrowing, intense negotiation, or division into smaller bills.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention75/100

Privacy protections versus retention of AML and law enforcement tools

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitStrengthens individual financial privacy and Fourth Amendment protections by requiring warrants for most record access.
  • Potential benefitReduces regulatory and reporting obligations for some nonfinancial businesses and payment platforms.
  • Potential benefitLimits centralized collection of personally identifiable financial data, lowering some cybersecurity and mass‑surveilla…
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenReductions in Bank Secrecy Act requirements may weaken anti‑money‑laundering and counterterrorist financing controls.
  • Potential burdenWarrant requirement and narrowed exceptions could slow lawful law‑enforcement investigations and increase investigative…
  • Potential burdenTerminating the Consolidated Audit Trail may impair market surveillance, enforcement, and systemic risk monitoring by r…
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Privacy protections versus retention of AML and law enforcement tools
Progressive20%

Likely skeptical or opposed overall.

While valuing stronger privacy protections, this persona will worry the bill eliminates critical anti-money laundering, tax-compliance, and consumer-protection tools and weakens executive enforcement needed for financial crime prevention.

Likely resistant
Centrist50%

Mixed view: supports stronger Fourth Amendment‑style protections for innocuous financial privacy, but concerns exist about broadly repealing Bank Secrecy Act authorities, terminating CAT, and imposing sweeping REINS constraints.

Prefers narrower, evidence-based reforms and clear national security exceptions.

Split reaction
Conservative90%

Likely broadly supportive.

This persona prioritizes limiting administrative power, strengthening financial privacy against government access, prohibiting a retail CBDC, and protecting cryptocurrency users.

The REINS-like rulemaking reforms align with curbing executive overreach.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood20/100

Comprehensive deregulatory and anti‑agency reforms across sensitive policy areas make enactment unlikely absent major narrowing, intense negotiation, or division into smaller bills.

Scope and complexity
86%
Scopesweeping
86%
Complexityhigh
Why this could stall
  • Unknown degree of bipartisan support in committees
  • Absent formal Congressional Budget Office score or cost estimate
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Privacy protections versus retention of AML and law enforcement tools

Comprehensive deregulatory and anti‑agency reforms across sensitive policy areas make enactment unlikely absent major narrowing, intense ne…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Saving Privacy Act.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis