S. 813 (119th)Bill Overview

SHOPP Act of 2025

Agriculture and Food|Agriculture and Food
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Mar 3, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill (SHOPP Act of 2025) amends the Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program to expand eligible foods for nutrition incentives. It explicitly permits fresh frozen fruits and vegetables and adds legumes to the list of eligible items, aiming to increase year-round availability of incentives for produce.

Why people may split

Liberals stress food access and nutrition improvements

Watch point

Small, technical expansion with low controversy; still requires committee action or attachment to larger legislation.

The bill (SHOPP Act of 2025) amends the Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program to expand eligible foods for nutrition incentives.

It explicitly permits fresh frozen fruits and vegetables and adds legumes to the list of eligible items, aiming to increase year-round availability of incentives for produce.

Passage55/100

Narrow, administratively focused change with low political salience and modest fiscal impact improves viability, but needs legislative vehicle or appropriations consideration.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention55/100

Liberals stress food access and nutrition improvements

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreases year‑round access to subsidized produce by allowing frozen options during off‑season periods.
  • Potential benefitMay improve nutrition for low‑income households by expanding acceptable formats of fruits, vegetables, and legumes.
  • Potential benefitCould boost demand for frozen produce processors, distributors, and legume producers, supporting related jobs.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenMay increase administrative complexity to verify eligible frozen and legume products across retailers.
  • Federal agenciesCould impose additional costs on program administrators without explicit new federal funding.
  • Potential burdenSmall retailers lacking frozen storage could face competitive disadvantages or implementation burdens.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals stress food access and nutrition improvements
Progressive90%

Likely supportive: this broadens healthy food access for low-income households and addresses seasonality.

It is a modest, targeted change to an existing nutrition-incentive program that aligns with food security and public-health goals.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Probably cautiously supportive: this is a narrow, practical change to expand eligible items and reduce seasonality barriers.

Support depends on implementation details, cost controls, and measurable outcomes.

Leans supportive
Conservative30%

Mixed to skeptical: some practical appeal in allowing frozen options, but concerns about expanding federally guided nutrition incentives.

Opposition centers on cost, federal reach, and administrative complexity.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood55/100

Narrow, administratively focused change with low political salience and modest fiscal impact improves viability, but needs legislative vehicle or appropriations consideration.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or CBO score included
  • Potential marginal increase in grant program spending
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals stress food access and nutrition improvements

Narrow, administratively focused change with low political salience and modest fiscal impact improves viability, but needs legislative vehi…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for SHOPP Act of 2025.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis