S. 836 (119th)Bill Overview

Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act

Commerce|Administrative law and regulatory proceduresChild safety and welfare
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Mar 4, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill substantially amends the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act to expand covered services to online and mobile applications and connected devices, extend protections to teens (ages 13–16), broaden the definition of personal information, ban individual-specific advertising to children and teens, require verifiable consent and deletion/correction rights, mandate security practices, and direct FTC and GAO studies and reports. It also requires FTC guidance, assesses a common consent mechanism, preserves state laws that offer greater protection, and includes rules on data transfers and retention.

Why people may split

Privacy protections and advertising limits versus regulatory burden on businesses

Watch point

Child privacy enjoys cross-aisle appeal, but industry opposition and revenue impacts make floor passage moderately challenging.

This bill substantially amends the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act to expand covered services to online and mobile applications and connected devices, extend protections to teens (ages 13–16), broaden the definition of personal information, ban individual-specific advertising to children and teens, require verifiable consent and deletion/correction rights, mandate security practices, and direct FTC and GAO studies and reports.

It also requires FTC guidance, assesses a common consent mechanism, preserves state laws that offer greater protection, and includes rules on data transfers and retention.

Passage45/100

Substantive modernization of COPPA could attract bipartisan support, but significant industry resistance, regulatory complexity, and enforcement questions lower prospects.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention68/100

Privacy protections and advertising limits versus regulatory burden on businesses

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedDevelopers

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitExpands privacy protections to teens and newer platforms, covering apps and connected devices.
  • Potential benefitProhibits individual-specific advertising to minors, likely reducing targeted marketing to children and teens.
  • Potential benefitGives teens rights to access, correct, and delete their personal information directly.
Likely burdened
  • DevelopersIncreases compliance costs for platforms, app developers, and connected device manufacturers.
  • Potential burdenMay reduce advertising revenue from minors, potentially affecting free or ad-supported services.
  • DevelopersSmall developers and startups could face disproportionate regulatory burdens and administrative overhead.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Privacy protections and advertising limits versus regulatory burden on businesses
Progressive90%

Overall supportive: the bill strengthens privacy protections for children and newly for teens, restricts targeted advertising, and creates deletion and correction rights.

Likely sees these as necessary updates to modern digital practices and supportive of children’s rights online.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally favorable but cautious: the bill updates COPPA for realistic internet practices while raising legitimate implementation and compliance tradeoffs.

Supports protections but wants clear, practicable rules and consideration of small business impacts.

Leans supportive
Conservative25%

Skeptical: supports parental control goals but concerned about federal overreach, expanded FTC regulatory power, and heavy compliance costs for businesses.

Views some definitions and prohibitions as burdensome and potentially harmful to innovation.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Substantive modernization of COPPA could attract bipartisan support, but significant industry resistance, regulatory complexity, and enforcement questions lower prospects.

Scope and complexity
86%
Scopesweeping
86%
Complexityhigh
Why this could stall
  • FTC rulemaking timeline and resource capacity
  • Industry compliance costs and lobbying response
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Privacy protections and advertising limits versus regulatory burden on businesses

Substantive modernization of COPPA could attract bipartisan support, but significant industry resistance, regulatory complexity, and enforc…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis