Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 264.
Creates a unified federal intake process and consolidated application system for disaster assistance under the Stafford Act. FEMA will build and operate the system, enable data sharing among certified federal disaster assistance agencies, permit limited Paperwork Reduction Act waivers during declared disasters, require data security and privacy assessments, set interagency agreements and breach-response rules, and mandate reporting to Congress and a GAO review.
Speed and streamlined access favored by left and center; conservatives worry federal centralization.
Technocratic, narrow administrative reform with broad appeal; modest privacy concerns could attract debate but are manageable.
Creates a unified federal intake process and consolidated application system for disaster assistance under the Stafford Act.
FEMA will build and operate the system, enable data sharing among certified federal disaster assistance agencies, permit limited Paperwork Reduction Act waivers during declared disasters, require data security and privacy assessments, set interagency agreements and breach-response rules, and mandate reporting to Congress and a GAO review.
Administrative, non-controversial goals increase prospects; data-sharing and privacy exemptions create the main legislative friction and legal risk.
How solid the drafting looks.
Speed and streamlined access favored by left and center; conservatives worry federal centralization.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Speed and streamlined access favored by left and center; conservatives worry federal centralization.
Generally supportive of streamlined access to aid and reduced paperwork burdens for survivors, while wary about broadened data sharing.
Seeks stronger, explicit privacy, nondiscrimination, and funding safeguards during design and implementation.
Cautiously favorable: the bill addresses clear administrative problems and includes oversight steps.
Wants clarity on costs, timelines, data limits, and practical coordination with states and tribes.
Skeptical of further federal centralization of disaster intake and expanded interagency data sharing.
Supports faster assistance but worries about overreach, costs, and weakened privacy safeguards.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Administrative, non-controversial goals increase prospects; data-sharing and privacy exemptions create the main legislative friction and legal risk.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Speed and streamlined access favored by left and center; conservatives worry federal centralization.
Administrative, non-controversial goals increase prospects; data-sharing and privacy exemptions create the main legislative friction and le…
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Disaster Assistance Simplification Act.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.