Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
The Co-Location Energy Act authorizes the Interior Secretary to allow evaluation, permitting, and operation of solar or wind systems on existing Federal energy leases (oil, gas, coal, geothermal) managed by the Secretary. The Secretary may only authorize evaluation or issue permits with the existing leaseholder’s consent.
Liberals emphasize NEPA protections; conservatives emphasize land-use efficiency.
Narrow, low-cost, administratively focused bill could attract bipartisan backers; NEPA exclusion language may draw some opposition.
The Co-Location Energy Act authorizes the Interior Secretary to allow evaluation, permitting, and operation of solar or wind systems on existing Federal energy leases (oil, gas, coal, geothermal) managed by the Secretary.
The Secretary may only authorize evaluation or issue permits with the existing leaseholder’s consent.
The Secretary must decide within 180 days whether such actions qualify for categorical exclusion under NEPA and promulgate a rule to implement the section.
Low fiscal impact and narrow scope aid prospects, but NEPA exemption questions, stakeholder opposition, and litigation risk reduce likelihood.
How solid the drafting looks.
Liberals emphasize NEPA protections; conservatives emphasize land-use efficiency.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize NEPA protections; conservatives emphasize land-use efficiency.
Generally supportive of renewable deployment but cautious.
Praises use of already-leased, potentially disturbed lands for clean energy, while worrying about NEPA categorical exclusions and weak environmental safeguards.
Concerned that leaseholder consent could give fossil lessees veto power and limit community input.
Pragmatic, sees bill as a sensible, incremental way to expand renewables using existing leases.
Values the leaseholder consent provision as protecting property interests, but wants clear standards and transparency in the Secretary’s rule and NEPA decisions.
Will weigh implementation details and fiscal/environmental tradeoffs.
Generally favorable: uses existing leased, disturbed lands and requires private leaseholder consent, respecting property and commercial interests.
Some concern about added federal rulemaking and potential regulatory complexity, but overall sees opportunity for market-driven renewable projects on federal lands.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low fiscal impact and narrow scope aid prospects, but NEPA exemption questions, stakeholder opposition, and litigation risk reduce likelihood.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize NEPA protections; conservatives emphasize land-use efficiency.
Low fiscal impact and narrow scope aid prospects, but NEPA exemption questions, stakeholder opposition, and litigation risk reduce likeliho…
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Co-Location Energy Act.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.