S. 916 (119th)Bill Overview

Stop Shackling and Detaining Pregnant Women Act

Crime and Law Enforcement|Crime and Law Enforcement
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Mar 10, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The Stop Shackling and Detaining Pregnant Women Act requires pregnancy testing at intake, creates a presumption of release for pregnant, lactating, and postpartum noncitizens, and sharply limits use of physical restraints. It mandates comprehensive prenatal, delivery, and postpartum health care (including abortion services), informed consent, privacy protections, staff training, facility arrangements with maternity hospitals, quarterly reporting by facilities, annual audits, and DHS rulemaking.

Why people may split

Abortion and reproductive services mandated vs state restrictions and conscience concerns

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly articulated substantive policy change that is comparatively well‑specified in definitions, prohibitions, and reporting obligations, and assigns responsibilities to named officials.

The Stop Shackling and Detaining Pregnant Women Act requires pregnancy testing at intake, creates a presumption of release for pregnant, lactating, and postpartum noncitizens, and sharply limits use of physical restraints.

It mandates comprehensive prenatal, delivery, and postpartum health care (including abortion services), informed consent, privacy protections, staff training, facility arrangements with maternity hospitals, quarterly reporting by facilities, annual audits, and DHS rulemaking.

Detention is allowed only in narrowly defined extraordinary circumstances, with weekly reviews and short temporary detention for removal limited to five days.

Passage20/100

Technically precise but intersects two high-conflict policy areas; likely to face strong opposition and procedural barriers despite narrow scope.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly articulated substantive policy change that is comparatively well‑specified in definitions, prohibitions, and reporting obligations, and assigns responsibilities to named officials. It delegates remaining technical standards to required rulemaking and includes timelines for reviews and reporting.

Contention70/100

Abortion and reproductive services mandated vs state restrictions and conscience concerns

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedStates

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitMay improve maternal health outcomes and reduce pregnancy-related complications among detained individuals.
  • Potential benefitRestricts shackling and involuntary medical treatment, strengthening bodily autonomy protections for pregnant detainees.
  • Potential benefitRequires facility reporting and annual audits, increasing transparency and oversight of detention medical care.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenImposes additional operational and compliance costs on DHS and detention contractors for testing, care, and reporting.
  • Potential burdenEstablishes a strong presumption of release, potentially complicating detention-based immigration enforcement operation…
  • StatesMandated access to abortion services may conflict with state restrictions, producing legal and logistical challenges.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Abortion and reproductive services mandated vs state restrictions and conscience concerns
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive.

The bill enshrines humane treatment, ends routine shackling during pregnancy and labor, and secures reproductive and postpartum health care for detained noncitizens.

Supporters will view reporting and training requirements as essential accountability measures.

Leans supportive
Centrist60%

Cautiously supportive but pragmatic.

The bill promotes humane standards and accountability, which are welcome, but raises practical concerns about operational burden, clarity of exceptions, and costs.

A centrist would press for clearer standards, implementation timelines, and funding.

Split reaction
Conservative25%

Likely opposed or skeptical.

The bill's presumption of release for pregnant and postpartum individuals and limitations on restraints are seen as constraining immigration enforcement.

Mandatory provision of abortion-related services and federal mandates across facilities raise legal and federalism concerns.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood20/100

Technically precise but intersects two high-conflict policy areas; likely to face strong opposition and procedural barriers despite narrow scope.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No formal cost estimate or budgetary offsets provided
  • State-law conflicts over reproductive services in detention settings
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Abortion and reproductive services mandated vs state restrictions and conscience concerns

Technically precise but intersects two high-conflict policy areas; likely to face strong opposition and procedural barriers despite narrow…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly articulated substantive policy change that is comparatively well‑specified in definitions, prohibitions, and reporting obligations, and assigns responsib…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis