S. 924 (119th)Bill Overview

Further Additional Continuing Appropriations and Other Extensions Act, 2025

Economics and Public Finance|Economics and Public Finance
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Mar 10, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 25.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill is a short-term continuing resolution and policy extension that pushes many FY2025 funding and program deadlines from late March/early April to April 11–12, 2025. It authorizes targeted appropriations and apportionments, including large Department of Defense shipbuilding apportionments and $1.93 billion for prior-year shipbuilding cost increases, a $750 million FEMA disaster relief appropriation contingent on presidential emergency designation, modest domestic program funds, and multiple temporary extensions of health, Medicare, telehealth, Medicaid, cyber, and other authorities.

Why people may split

Support for health and telehealth extensions vs concern over entitlement expansion

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified appropriations/extension measure: it provides precise statutory amendments, dates, and dollar amounts appropriate for short-term continuing appropriations and program extensions, while delegating routine implementation to executing agencies.

This bill is a short-term continuing resolution and policy extension that pushes many FY2025 funding and program deadlines from late March/early April to April 11–12, 2025.

It authorizes targeted appropriations and apportionments, including large Department of Defense shipbuilding apportionments and $1.93 billion for prior-year shipbuilding cost increases, a $750 million FEMA disaster relief appropriation contingent on presidential emergency designation, modest domestic program funds, and multiple temporary extensions of health, Medicare, telehealth, Medicaid, cyber, and other authorities.

It also amends several statutes (CFTC whistleblower, DHS unmanned aircraft protections, special assessments) and states that the division’s budgetary effects should not be entered on PAYGO scorecards.

Passage70/100

Short-term CRs that prevent funding gaps and include modest targeted funding generally clear Congress, though riders and emergency designations create negotiating points.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified appropriations/extension measure: it provides precise statutory amendments, dates, and dollar amounts appropriate for short-term continuing appropriations and program extensions, while delegating routine implementation to executing agencies.

Contention58/100

Support for health and telehealth extensions vs concern over entitlement expansion

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitPrevents a near-term government funding gap and avoids service interruptions through mid-April.
  • Potential benefitProvides $750 million for disaster relief to accelerate recovery if the President declares an emergency.
  • Potential benefitAllocates additional shipbuilding funding supporting defense industrial base stability and related manufacturing jobs.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenShort-term extensions perpetuate recurring stopgap funding, creating planning uncertainty for agencies and recipients.
  • Potential burdenThe bill exempts its budgetary effects from PAYGO and scorecards, reducing transparency of fiscal impacts.
  • Potential burdenLarge defense apportionments and prior‑year cost payments may receive less deliberative appropriations scrutiny.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Support for health and telehealth extensions vs concern over entitlement expansion
Progressive70%

Generally supportive of the health, Medicare, telehealth, Medicaid, and disaster relief extensions that avoid service interruptions.

Concerned about the sizeable unoffset defense shipbuilding apportionments and the language exempting these actions from PAYGO and scorecards.

Leans supportive
Centrist60%

Pragmatic support for a short-term CR to avert disruptions while preferring final appropriations work continue.

Accepts targeted disaster and health extensions but is wary of ad hoc defense funding and PAYGO carve-outs that complicate budget discipline.

Split reaction
Conservative30%

Supports preventing a shutdown and some defense-related funding, but objects to non-defense domestic spending increases and the bill's PAYGO/scorecard exemptions.

Skeptical of temporary telehealth and entitlement extensions without offsets.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood70/100

Short-term CRs that prevent funding gaps and include modest targeted funding generally clear Congress, though riders and emergency designations create negotiating points.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Whether the President will designate the $750M as emergency
  • Absence of a public cost estimate/CBO score in text
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Support for health and telehealth extensions vs concern over entitlement expansion

Short-term CRs that prevent funding gaps and include modest targeted funding generally clear Congress, though riders and emergency designat…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified appropriations/extension measure: it provides precise statutory amendments, dates, and dollar amounts appropriate for short-term continuing approp…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis