S. 940 (119th)Bill Overview

Transparency in Banking Act

Finance and Financial Sector|Finance and Financial Sector
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Mar 11, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill requires the Federal Reserve Board, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, OCC, and FDIC, in consultation with the Treasury, to submit an annual report to Congress and post it online about U.S. engagement with the Basel Committee on Bank Supervision. The report must list attendees, issues, options, standards under consideration, legal authority for implementation, and subcommittee activities; agencies must notify Congress within 30 days of significant changes and include meeting results, minutes summaries, proposals discussed, and the positions taken by U.S. representatives.

Why people may split

Transparency versus protecting negotiation confidentiality and market-sensitive information

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused reporting requirement that is generally well-scoped and reasonably specific about content and timing, but it omits several practical implementation and legal-integration details.

The bill requires the Federal Reserve Board, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, OCC, and FDIC, in consultation with the Treasury, to submit an annual report to Congress and post it online about U.S. engagement with the Basel Committee on Bank Supervision.

The report must list attendees, issues, options, standards under consideration, legal authority for implementation, and subcommittee activities; agencies must notify Congress within 30 days of significant changes and include meeting results, minutes summaries, proposals discussed, and the positions taken by U.S. representatives.

The Fed Chair and Vice Chair for Supervision must include these report details in their annual congressional testimony.

Passage45/100

Low-cost, technical transparency measure with plausible bipartisan support, but legal/confidentiality concerns and limited political priority reduce chances.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused reporting requirement that is generally well-scoped and reasonably specific about content and timing, but it omits several practical implementation and legal-integration details.

Contention30/100

Transparency versus protecting negotiation confidentiality and market-sensitive information

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreases congressional oversight and transparency of international banking negotiations.
  • Potential benefitProvides banks and businesses earlier notice of potential international standards affecting them.
  • Potential benefitClarifies which legal authorities would be used to implement Basel-derived standards domestically.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesImposes additional administrative and reporting burdens on federal banking regulators.
  • Potential burdenCould chill candid international negotiations if positions and votes become public quickly.
  • Potential burdenMay force disclosure of sensitive or preliminary positions, risking market or competitive effects.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Transparency versus protecting negotiation confidentiality and market-sensitive information
Progressive80%

Generally supportive because the bill increases transparency and democratic oversight of international banking rulemaking.

Concerned that mandatory public disclosure of positions could weaken regulators' ability to negotiate strong consumer and financial protections.

Wants safeguards to prevent disclosure of market-sensitive or confidential supervisory information while preserving public accountability.

Leans supportive
Centrist60%

Supportive of increased transparency and congressional notice but cautious about operational tradeoffs.

Wants clearer definitions (e.g., 'significant change'), protections for confidential data, and cost estimates to avoid undue burden or reduced negotiating effectiveness.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Largely favorable as a check on international regulatory influence and to prevent imposition of Basel standards without congressional awareness.

Sees value in exposing who advocates which positions.

Minor reservations about paperwork and potential politicization of technical negotiations.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Low-cost, technical transparency measure with plausible bipartisan support, but legal/confidentiality concerns and limited political priority reduce chances.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether Basel or foreign partners permit disclosure of minutes or votes
  • Agency resistance citing confidentiality or diplomatic/practical constraints
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Transparency versus protecting negotiation confidentiality and market-sensitive information

Low-cost, technical transparency measure with plausible bipartisan support, but legal/confidentiality concerns and limited political priori…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused reporting requirement that is generally well-scoped and reasonably specific about content and timing, but it omits several practical implementation and l…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis