Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
The bill amends title 23, U.S. Code, to expand the Highway Safety Improvement Program to explicitly include projects that connect bicyclist and pedestrian infrastructure and projects that reduce risks for vulnerable road users. It allows the Federal share of certain qualifying projects to be up to 100 percent, increases flexible financing options, and permits section 148 funds to count toward non‑Federal matching for related projects.
100% federal share: hailed as access expansion vs seen as federal overreach
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a targeted statutory amendment that clearly modifies program eligibility and funding rules for the highway safety improvement program to prioritize bicyclist and pedestrian infrastructure, integrating those changes directly into existing statutory text.
The bill amends title 23, U.S. Code, to expand the Highway Safety Improvement Program to explicitly include projects that connect bicyclist and pedestrian infrastructure and projects that reduce risks for vulnerable road users.
It allows the Federal share of certain qualifying projects to be up to 100 percent, increases flexible financing options, and permits section 148 funds to count toward non‑Federal matching for related projects.
The bill also lists eligible local safety plans (for example, ADA transition plans, Vision Zero, Complete Streets) and adds FHWA‑determined Proven Safety Countermeasures for bicyclists or pedestrians to certain higher‑federal‑share provisions.
Content is technical and broadly uncontroversial, increasing chance if folded into broader transportation legislation; standalone enactment less certain.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a targeted statutory amendment that clearly modifies program eligibility and funding rules for the highway safety improvement program to prioritize bicyclist and pedestrian infrastructure, integrating those changes directly into existing statutory text.
100% federal share: hailed as access expansion vs seen as federal overreach
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
100% federal share: hailed as access expansion vs seen as federal overreach
Likely strongly supportive.
The bill directs federal resources toward pedestrian and bicyclist safety, recognizes ADA and Vision Zero plans, and reduces local cost barriers for vulnerable road user projects.
Generally favorable but cautious.
The bill improves safety incentives and financing flexibility, yet raises questions about fiscal impact, oversight, and how projects will be prioritized across jurisdictions.
Skeptical.
While supporting safety goals in principle, this persona would view expanded 100% federal funding and FHWA discretion as federal overreach and fiscal risk.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is technical and broadly uncontroversial, increasing chance if folded into broader transportation legislation; standalone enactment less certain.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
100% federal share: hailed as access expansion vs seen as federal overreach
Content is technical and broadly uncontroversial, increasing chance if folded into broader transportation legislation; standalone enactment…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a targeted statutory amendment that clearly modifies program eligibility and funding rules for the highway safety improvement program to prioritize bicyclist and p…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.