Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
This bill bars any Federal funds from being used to close or realign the Marine Corps Recruit Depot at Parris Island, South Carolina. It also prohibits funding for planning or activities related to such a closure or realignment.
Progressives emphasize jobs and heritage; conservatives stress readiness and tradition.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a focused administrative restriction by prohibiting the use of Federal funds for closing, realigning, or planning to close or realign the Marine Corps Recruit Depot at Parris Island.
This bill bars any Federal funds from being used to close or realign the Marine Corps Recruit Depot at Parris Island, South Carolina.
It also prohibits funding for planning or activities related to such a closure or realignment.
The bill cites Parris Island's historical significance, training value, and need for continued investment.
Narrow protective language matches frequent congressional practice of preserving bases; more likely if attached to must-pass defense bills than as standalone law.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a focused administrative restriction by prohibiting the use of Federal funds for closing, realigning, or planning to close or realign the Marine Corps Recruit Depot at Parris Island. It states its purpose through findings and uses a direct funding prohibition as the operative mechanism.
Progressives emphasize jobs and heritage; conservatives stress readiness and tradition.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize jobs and heritage; conservatives stress readiness and tradition.
Likely supportive overall because the bill protects jobs, preserves a culturally significant training site, and maintains continuity for recruits.
Some on the left may worry about locking in military infrastructure without considering broader budget or social priorities.
Mixed: recognizes benefits to readiness, workforce, and local economy, but worries about constraining Department of Defense planning and long-term cost tradeoffs.
Would prefer safeguards such as review or sunset provisions.
Strongly favorable: affirms commitment to Marine readiness, honors tradition, and protects local jobs.
Views prohibition on closure or realignment as preventing politically driven base reductions and protecting national security interests.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow protective language matches frequent congressional practice of preserving bases; more likely if attached to must-pass defense bills than as standalone law.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize jobs and heritage; conservatives stress readiness and tradition.
Narrow protective language matches frequent congressional practice of preserving bases; more likely if attached to must-pass defense bills…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a focused administrative restriction by prohibiting the use of Federal funds for closing, realigning, or planning to close or realign the Marine Corps Rec…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.