S. 97 (119th)Bill Overview

Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act

Commerce|CommerceCompetitiveness, trade promotion, trade deficits
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Jan 15, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Held at the desk.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill directs the Executive Director of SelectUSA to solicit input from State economic development organizations on increasing foreign direct investment (FDI) in semiconductor-related manufacturing, identify barriers and opportunities, and develop recommendations. Within two years SelectUSA must report to relevant Congressional committees describing comments received, current activities, and strategies to increase FDI while preventing foreign adversaries from benefiting.

Why people may split

Labor/environmental safeguards vs focus on rapid investment attraction

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured reporting requirement that clearly defines the problem, assigns responsibility, sets deadlines, and specifies report contents while relying on existing authorities and resources.

This bill directs the Executive Director of SelectUSA to solicit input from State economic development organizations on increasing foreign direct investment (FDI) in semiconductor-related manufacturing, identify barriers and opportunities, and develop recommendations.

Within two years SelectUSA must report to relevant Congressional committees describing comments received, current activities, and strategies to increase FDI while preventing foreign adversaries from benefiting.

The Act requires coordination with federal agencies and states, and authorizes no additional appropriations.

Passage60/100

Narrow, low-cost, security-linked administrative bill fits common bipartisan passage patterns, though timing/priorities could delay enactment.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured reporting requirement that clearly defines the problem, assigns responsibility, sets deadlines, and specifies report contents while relying on existing authorities and resources.

Contention22/100

Labor/environmental safeguards vs focus on rapid investment attraction

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · StatesCities · States

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesMay increase foreign direct investment in U.S. semiconductor manufacturing by coordinating federal and state attraction…
  • StatesCould create manufacturing jobs and supply-chain-related employment in states securing new investments.
  • Potential benefitStrengthens supply-chain resilience by promoting onshoring, reshoring, or diversification of vulnerable semiconductor s…
Likely burdened
  • CitiesNo additional funding may constrain SelectUSAs capacity to implement recommendations effectively.
  • Potential burdenFDI promotion could favor foreign firms, creating perceived competitive disadvantages for domestic companies.
  • StatesState economic development offices may face administrative burdens responding within the 180‑day solicitation timeframe.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Labor/environmental safeguards vs focus on rapid investment attraction
Progressive75%

Generally supportive of efforts to onshore and bolster semiconductor capacity for jobs and national security, but concerned about implementation details.

Will look for safeguards ensuring labor, environmental protections, and that FDI benefits workers and communities.

Views the report and coordination as useful but insufficient without funding and enforceable standards.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Sees the bill as a pragmatic, low-cost step to coordinate FDI attraction and strengthen critical supply chains.

Appreciates intergovernmental coordination and national security guardrails, but expects measurable metrics and accountability.

Concerned the 'no additional funds' clause could hamper implementation and impact.

Leans supportive
Conservative70%

Likely supportive of measures that revive domestic manufacturing and limit dependence on rivals.

Favours the bill's limited federal footprint and lack of new spending.

Skeptical about federal coordination that could evolve into industrial policy or pick winners and losers.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood60/100

Narrow, low-cost, security-linked administrative bill fits common bipartisan passage patterns, though timing/priorities could delay enactment.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No formal cost estimate or staffing analysis provided
  • Actual responsiveness and capacity of SelectUSA to implement
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Labor/environmental safeguards vs focus on rapid investment attraction

Narrow, low-cost, security-linked administrative bill fits common bipartisan passage patterns, though timing/priorities could delay enactme…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured reporting requirement that clearly defines the problem, assigns responsibility, sets deadlines, and specifies report contents while relying on ex…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis