Referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (text: CR S1463)
This resolution is a nonbinding statement by both chambers of Congress that supports the Local Radio Freedom Act and urges that Congress should not impose new performance fees on local radio stations or businesses that play radio. It does not change existing law or create legal penalties. It expresses a policy preference and asks lawmakers to avoid creating new royalties or charges for over-the-air local radio broadcasts.
Concurrent resolutions must be passed by both the House and the Senate but are not sent to the President and do not have the force of law. This resolution therefore expresses Congresss view but does not itself prevent agencies or courts from taking actions or change current legal obligations.
This concurrent resolution expresses Congressional opposition to imposing any new performance fee, tax, royalty, or other charge for public performances of sound recordings by local over‑the‑air radio stations, or on businesses for playing such broadcasts.
It emphasizes the promotional and public‑service role of local radio and warns that new fees would harm local stations, small businesses, and consumers.
The text is advisory, stating that Congress should not adopt such fees.
Nonbinding, narrow, and administratively simple improves odds; industry conflict (recording artists vs broadcasters) and lower legislative priority reduce probability.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this concurrent resolution is clear in purpose and specific in the policy position it expresses, but it contains minimal legal/implementation detail, fiscal analysis, or accountability mechanisms—consistent with a symbolic, non-binding measure.
Whether prohibiting fees unduly harms recording artists' compensation
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Whether prohibiting fees unduly harms recording artists' compensation
Mixed reaction: values local radio's public service but worries about fair compensation for recording artists.
Likely skeptical that a blanket prohibition is the best outcome for performers and creative labor.
Pragmatic and cautious: sees merit in protecting local radio and small businesses but recognizes artists' compensation concerns.
Would favor limited, targeted solutions or trial approaches rather than an absolute ban.
Supportive: favors protecting localism, small businesses, and limiting new taxes or regulatory costs.
Views the resolution as defending free over‑the‑air broadcasting and community service.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Nonbinding, narrow, and administratively simple improves odds; industry conflict (recording artists vs broadcasters) and lower legislative priority reduce probability.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Whether prohibiting fees unduly harms recording artists' compensation
Nonbinding, narrow, and administratively simple improves odds; industry conflict (recording artists vs broadcasters) and lower legislative…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this concurrent resolution is clear in purpose and specific in the policy position it expresses, but it contains minimal legal/implementation detail, fiscal analysis, or accoun…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.