S. Res. 118 (119th)Bill Overview

A resolution designating March 6, 2025, as "National Slam the Scam Day" to raise awareness about pervasive scams and to promote education to prevent government imposter scams and other types of scams.

Simple ResolutionCommerce|AgingCommemorative events and holidays
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Mar 6, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1616-1617; text: CR S1609-1610)

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This Senate resolution designates March 6, 2025, as “National Slam the Scam Day” to raise public awareness of government imposter scams and other scams. It recognizes roles of law enforcement, consumer groups, telephone companies, aging agencies, and financial institutions, encourages prevention policies and reporting to appropriate agencies, and honors those who combat scams.

Why people may split

Symbolic value versus demand for funded follow-through

Watch point

Ceremonial, low cost, bipartisan appeal; potential minor scheduling/prioritization hurdle in the House.

This Senate resolution designates March 6, 2025, as “National Slam the Scam Day” to raise public awareness of government imposter scams and other scams.

It recognizes roles of law enforcement, consumer groups, telephone companies, aging agencies, and financial institutions, encourages prevention policies and reporting to appropriate agencies, and honors those who combat scams.

Passage85/100

Ceremonial, non‑controversial measures historically clear their chamber(s) easily; no fiscal or regulatory obstacles.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention10/100

Symbolic value versus demand for funded follow-through

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLocal governments

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises public awareness about government imposter scams and prevention techniques.
  • Potential benefitMay increase reporting of scam incidents to regulators and law enforcement agencies.
  • Potential benefitHighlights disproportionate harms to older adults, potentially prioritizing protective outreach.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenIs purely symbolic and does not authorize funding or new enforcement powers.
  • Potential burdenMay have limited measurable effect on actual scam loss reductions from a one‑day designation.
  • Local governmentsCould duplicate existing state, local, and private anti‑scam campaigns without added value.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Symbolic value versus demand for funded follow-through
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive as a consumer-protection, public-education measure that helps vulnerable populations.

Would welcome emphasis on older adults and cross-agency coordination, while wanting follow-up with funded programs and enforcement improvements.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Generally supportive as a low-cost, bipartisan awareness initiative that protects consumers.

Sees value in public education but notes the resolution is symbolic and should be paired with cost-effective, measurable programs.

Leans supportive
Conservative85%

Likely supportive because it defends individuals and is symbolic with minimal cost.

Would caution against expanding federal bureaucracy or unfunded mandates and prefer private-sector involvement and state-led solutions.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood85/100

Ceremonial, non‑controversial measures historically clear their chamber(s) easily; no fiscal or regulatory obstacles.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether House consideration is necessary or will be scheduled
  • Actual follow‑through by agencies on awareness efforts
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Symbolic value versus demand for funded follow-through

Ceremonial, non‑controversial measures historically clear their chamber(s) easily; no fiscal or regulatory obstacles.

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for A resolution designating March 6, 2025, as "National Slam the…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis