S. Res. 128 (119th)Bill Overview

A resolution recognizing March 14, 2025, as "Black Midwives Day" and the longstanding and invaluable contributions of Black midwives to maternal and infant health in the United States.

Health|Health
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Mar 14, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S1781-1782)

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This Senate resolution designates March 14, 2025, as "Black Midwives Day" and recognizes the historical and current contributions of Black midwives to maternal and infant health.

It encourages federal, state, and local actions to address racial disparities in maternal health by expanding midwifery workforce diversity, removing barriers to midwifery practice and accreditation, promoting Medicaid and TRICARE coverage, funding education and mentorship, and destigmatizing and decriminalizing midwifery.

Passage2/100

S.Res. is symbolic and nonbinding; adoption by the Senate is likely, but it does not create law—policy changes recommended would require separate binding legislation.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions primarily as a commemorative Senate resolution that effectively raises awareness and catalogs policy issues and recommended actions. Its factual findings and calls to action are clear and well‑organized for a nonbinding measure.

Contention65/100

Scope-of-practice: autonomous midwife practice versus safety oversight

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersStates · Federal agencies
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay increase access to culturally concordant midwifery care for Black birthing people, potentially improving maternal a…
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould expand workforce opportunities and jobs for Black midwives, educators, and preceptors through funding and mentors…
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay reduce overall maternity costs by promoting midwife-led care associated with fewer interventions and lower cesarean…
Likely burdened
  • StatesMay prompt conflicts with existing state licensing regimes over scope of practice and regulatory authority.
  • Targeted stakeholdersRecognizing all training pathways might raise safety and standardization concerns among some medical organizations.
  • Federal agenciesExpanding Medicaid/TRICARE coverage and funding commitments could increase federal and state program expenditures.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Scope-of-practice: autonomous midwife practice versus safety oversight
Progressive95%

Overall supportive; views the resolution as a meaningful recognition and a useful policy signal to address racial maternal health disparities.

Sees calls for workforce diversification, coverage expansion, and decriminalization as aligned with reproductive justice and health equity goals.

May want stronger, binding legislation and targeted funding included.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally favorable toward symbolic recognition and pragmatic steps to improve maternal outcomes, while seeking more clarity.

Supports expanding access to midwifery alongside safety standards and oversight.

Wants cost estimates, measurable goals, and coordination with obstetric providers to manage risks.

Leans supportive
Conservative30%

Mixed to skeptical: accepts symbolic recognition but expresses strong reservations about policy recommendations.

Concerns focus on public safety, scope-of-practice expansion for non-clinical midwives, federal encouragement to override state regulation, and potential Medicaid/TRICARE cost increases.

Prefers state control and rigorous credentialing.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood2/100

S.Res. is symbolic and nonbinding; adoption by the Senate is likely, but it does not create law—policy changes recommended would require separate binding legislation.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the Senate will formally adopt the resolution by unanimous consent
  • Whether recommendations spawn follow-up binding legislation
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Scope-of-practice: autonomous midwife practice versus safety oversight

S.Res. is symbolic and nonbinding; adoption by the Senate is likely, but it does not create law—policy changes recommended would require se…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions primarily as a commemorative Senate resolution that effectively raises awareness and catalogs policy issues and recommended actions. Its factual findings an…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis