S. Res. 131 (119th)Bill Overview

A resolution designating the third week of March 2025 as "National CACFP Week".

Simple ResolutionAgriculture and Food|Agriculture and FoodCommemorative events and holidays
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Mar 14, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1785; text: CR S1783)

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This Senate resolution designates the week beginning March 16, 2025, as "National CACFP Week" and recognizes the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) for providing nutritious meals and supporting child and adult care providers across the United States. It highlights CACFP participation statistics from 2024 and notes program benefits for vulnerable populations, small providers, and child-care quality.

Why people may split

Symbolic recognition versus need for substantive funding or policy change

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly states its purpose, provides supporting context, and specifies the exact week to be designated.

This Senate resolution designates the week beginning March 16, 2025, as "National CACFP Week" and recognizes the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) for providing nutritious meals and supporting child and adult care providers across the United States.

It highlights CACFP participation statistics from 2024 and notes program benefits for vulnerable populations, small providers, and child-care quality.

Passage0/100

This is a Senate simple resolution—symbolic and nonbinding—and simple resolutions do not become law under normal congressional procedure.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly states its purpose, provides supporting context, and specifies the exact week to be designated. It intentionally contains minimal implementation, fiscal, or accountability provisions, which is typical for this class of measure.

Contention10/100

Symbolic recognition versus need for substantive funding or policy change

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises public awareness of CACFP, potentially increasing program enrollment and participation.
  • Local governmentsSignals federal recognition that may boost local support and advocacy for CACFP funding.
  • Potential benefitHighlights CACFP's role improving nutrition for millions, reinforcing public health messaging.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenSymbolic designation creates no funding, regulatory, or programmatic changes.
  • Federal agenciesMay raise expectations for expanded services without allocating federal resources.
  • Potential burdenOpportunity cost: congressional time spent on nonbinding observance instead of substantive legislation.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Symbolic recognition versus need for substantive funding or policy change
Progressive95%

Generally supportive; sees the designation as a helpful public acknowledgement of a program that serves low-income children and adults.

Views the resolution as aligning with priorities on nutrition, equity, and support for care providers, while noting it is symbolic and not a funding mechanism.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Favorable but pragmatic; views the resolution as a low-cost, bipartisan recognition of an existing federal program.

Appreciates highlighting program benefits while wanting clarity that this is symbolic and not a substitute for targeted policy or fiscal review.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Generally tolerant to supportive; may view the week designation as a benign acknowledgement of a federal program that helps families and small care businesses.

Some concern may remain about federal programs' scope, but symbolic recognition is unlikely to provoke opposition.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

This is a Senate simple resolution—symbolic and nonbinding—and simple resolutions do not become law under normal congressional procedure.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House will adopt a parallel recognition
  • Whether sponsors intend further binding legislative action
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Symbolic recognition versus need for substantive funding or policy change

This is a Senate simple resolution—symbolic and nonbinding—and simple resolutions do not become law under normal congressional procedure.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly states its purpose, provides supporting context, and specifies the exact week to be designated. It intentio…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis