S. Res. 138 (119th)Bill Overview

A resolution supporting the goals and ideals of "Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Awareness Month".

Simple ResolutionHealth|Cardiovascular and respiratory healthCommemorative events and holidays
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Mar 25, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1839; text: CR S1838)

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This Senate resolution designates March as "Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Awareness Month" and expresses support for raising awareness of DVT and PE. The preamble summarizes incidence, mortality, risk factors, vulnerable populations, and estimated medical costs, and the resolution encourages awareness of these preventable conditions.

Why people may split

Progressive wants funding and equity-focused follow-up

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a straightforward commemorative instrument: it clearly defines the public-health issue and formally expresses the Senate's support and recognition.

This Senate resolution designates March as "Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Awareness Month" and expresses support for raising awareness of DVT and PE.

The preamble summarizes incidence, mortality, risk factors, vulnerable populations, and estimated medical costs, and the resolution encourages awareness of these preventable conditions.

Passage3/100

As a simple Senate resolution it expresses sentiment but does not create law; conversion to law would require different vehicle.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a straightforward commemorative instrument: it clearly defines the public-health issue and formally expresses the Senate's support and recognition. Its minimalist structure—declaratory operative clauses without funding, mandates, or reporting—is appropriate for a symbolic awareness-month resolution.

Contention10/100

Progressive wants funding and equity-focused follow-up

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises public awareness potentially leading to earlier detection and treatment of DVT and PE.
  • Potential benefitMay reduce preventable deaths by promoting recognition of symptoms and risk factors.
  • Potential benefitEncourages clinicians and hospitals to adopt or reinforce thrombosis prevention protocols.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenThe resolution is symbolic and does not authorize funding or new programs.
  • Potential burdenIt contains no enforcement mechanisms or measurable targets for reducing DVT and PE.
  • Federal agenciesMay duplicate existing public health efforts by federal, state, and nonprofit organizations.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressive wants funding and equity-focused follow-up
Progressive95%

Likely fully supportive as a public health measure that highlights preventable illness and health disparities.

Would welcome awareness but push for concrete funding, equitable access, and data-driven prevention efforts beyond symbolic recognition.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Generally supportive because it's a low-cost, bipartisan, awareness-focused resolution.

Would emphasize measurable outcomes and prefer accompanying evidence-based programs before expanding federal commitments.

Leans supportive
Conservative85%

Likely supportive of a nonbinding, awareness-focused resolution that recognizes a health issue.

Would be cautious about any downstream federal spending or mandates prompted by the resolution.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood3/100

As a simple Senate resolution it expresses sentiment but does not create law; conversion to law would require different vehicle.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether a House counterpart will be introduced
  • Whether sponsors seek a concurrent/joint resolution to formalize designation
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressive wants funding and equity-focused follow-up

As a simple Senate resolution it expresses sentiment but does not create law; conversion to law would require different vehicle.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a straightforward commemorative instrument: it clearly defines the public-health issue and formally expresses the Senate's support and recognition. Its minim…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis