S. Res. 160 (119th)Bill Overview

A resolution supporting the goals and ideals of National Safe Digging Month.

Simple ResolutionScience, Technology, Communications|Broadcasting, cable, digital technologiesCommemorative events and holidays
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Apr 7, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2459: 4; text: CR S2458-2459: 2)

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses the Senate's support for National Safe Digging Month and urges homeowners and excavators to call or go online to 811 before digging. It is a non-binding statement that encourages safe digging practices and public awareness but does not create new legal requirements or change federal law. Simple resolutions are actions taken by one chamber and do not go to the President or become law.

This Senate resolution expresses support for National Safe Digging Month (April) and encourages homeowners, excavators, and stakeholders to contact 811 before digging to have underground utilities located and marked.

It cites the origins of the 811 one‑call system, damage statistics from the Common Ground Alliance, and urges education and awareness to prevent service interruption, environmental harm, injury, and death.

Passage5/100

As a nonbinding Senate resolution, it expresses sentiment rather than creating law, so becoming statutory law is unlikely.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a conventional commemorative resolution: it states a clear purpose, cites relevant background law and data, and issues general encouragements without creating legal obligations, funding, or enforcement mechanisms.

Contention10/100

Progressive wants funding and targeted outreach; conservatives do not.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
UtilitiesStates

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • UtilitiesCould reduce utility strikes, lowering service interruptions and infrastructure damage.
  • Potential benefitCould lower repair, emergency response, and associated public costs from excavation incidents.
  • UtilitiesCould prevent personal injuries and fatalities by encouraging pre-dig utility location.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenNonbinding resolution creates no funding or enforcement mechanisms to change behavior.
  • Potential burdenLikely limited measurable effect on excavator behavior without outreach funding or regulation.
  • StatesMay increase call center demand, requiring additional state and industry operational resources.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressive wants funding and targeted outreach; conservatives do not.
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive as a public‑safety and environmental protection measure that promotes prevention and reduces harm.

Would welcome awareness efforts but may view the resolution as limited without funding or targeted outreach to underserved communities.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Likely supportive as a low‑cost, common‑sense, bipartisan resolution promoting safety.

Views it as a constructive awareness step but would want measurable outcomes or state/federal coordination to ensure effectiveness.

Leans supportive
Conservative85%

Likely supportive because it promotes safety, personal responsibility, and protects private infrastructure with minimal federal cost.

May caution about implying expanded federal programs or unfunded mandates, but sees this resolution as largely benign.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood5/100

As a nonbinding Senate resolution, it expresses sentiment rather than creating law, so becoming statutory law is unlikely.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether a companion House resolution will be introduced
  • Practical impact on public awareness is unknown
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressive wants funding and targeted outreach; conservatives do not.

As a nonbinding Senate resolution, it expresses sentiment rather than creating law, so becoming statutory law is unlikely.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a conventional commemorative resolution: it states a clear purpose, cites relevant background law and data, and issues general encouragements without cre…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis