S. Res. 172 (119th)Bill Overview

Support Black Maternal Health Week April 11-17 2025

Simple ResolutionHealth|Health
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Apr 10, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is the Senate formally recognizing and supporting the designation of April 11 through April 17, 2025, as Black Maternal Health Week. It highlights the high rates of maternal mortality and morbidity among Black women and birthing people and encourages attention to community-led solutions and policy actions to address those disparities. The resolution expresses the Senate's views but does not create legal rights or require government action.

Passage rules

This is a Senate-only simple resolution that only needs approval by the Senate; it does not go to the House or the President and does not have the force of law.

This Senate resolution recognizes April 11–17, 2025, as the eighth annual Black Maternal Health Week and highlights alarming Black maternal mortality and morbidity disparities.

It cites CDC data, names drivers such as structural racism and access gaps, and endorses policy priorities including community-led care, one-year postpartum coverage, and passage of the Black Maternal Health Momnibus Act.

Passage70/100

Nonbinding awareness resolution with low fiscal impact and narrow scope is historically likely to be adopted despite potentially contentious language.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-documented commemorative resolution: it clearly states the problem, supplies supporting data and rationale for the observance, and sets out awareness and advocacy objectives appropriate to a symbolic designation. It also includes advocacy references to specific legislation and policy areas without creating legal obligations.

Contention65/100

Symbolic recognition versus demand for funded action and timelines

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
CommunitiesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises national awareness about Black maternal mortality disparities.
  • Potential benefitIncreases legislative momentum for maternal health bills like the Momnibus.
  • CommunitiesEncourages funding for community-based maternal health programs and perinatal workforce.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenThe resolution is non-binding and may produce no direct policy or funding changes.
  • Potential burdenCritics may say symbolic designation diverts attention from measurable legislative actions.
  • Potential burdenAdvocating specific frameworks could complicate consensus on policy solutions across stakeholders.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Symbolic recognition versus demand for funded action and timelines
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive; sees the resolution as an important national recognition of racialized maternal health inequities.

Views calls for one-year postpartum coverage, community-led investments, and passage of the Momnibus as necessary policy directions.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally favorable but pragmatic and cautious; supports awareness and data-driven solutions while seeking clarity on costs and federal versus state roles.

Would push for measurable pilots, accountable funding, and bipartisan implementation pathways.

Leans supportive
Conservative30%

Mildly skeptical; may accept awareness goals but worries about federal overreach, spending, and language on reproductive rights and decriminalization.

Prefers state-led solutions and fiscal restraint over new federal mandates.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood70/100

Nonbinding awareness resolution with low fiscal impact and narrow scope is historically likely to be adopted despite potentially contentious language.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Potential floor objections tied to reproductive-rights language
  • Whether leadership will schedule a unanimous-consent agreement
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Symbolic recognition versus demand for funded action and timelines

Nonbinding awareness resolution with low fiscal impact and narrow scope is historically likely to be adopted despite potentially contentiou…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-documented commemorative resolution: it clearly states the problem, supplies supporting data and rationale for the observance, and sets out awareness and ad…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis