S. Res. 175 (119th)Bill Overview

A resolution recognizing April 14, 2025, as "World Quantum Day", and commemorating and supporting the goals of World Quantum Day.

Simple ResolutionScience, Technology, Communications|Commemorative events and holidaysScience and engineering education
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Apr 10, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a nonbinding statement by the Senate that recognizes April 14, 2025, as World Quantum Day and expresses support for the day and its goals. It encourages schools and educators to mark the day with activities that teach students about quantum physics and STEM. It does not create new law, does not require action by the President, and only expresses the Senate's views and encouragement.

This Senate resolution designates April 14, 2025, as "World Quantum Day," recognizes the role of quantum physics and quantum information science, supports the goals of World Quantum Day, and encourages schools and educators to mark the day with STEM-focused activities about quantum science and technology.

It is a non‑binding, symbolic resolution that promotes public understanding and education in quantum science.

Passage2/100

As a chamber resolution it expresses sentiment but does not create binding law; symbolic observances rarely translate into statutory law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly drafted commemorative resolution that appropriately confines itself to recognition, supportive language, and encouragement of educational observance without creating new legal obligations or funding commitments.

Contention12/100

Progressives stress equity and public funding; conservatives stress local control.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
StudentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises public awareness of quantum science and technology, potentially improving general understanding.
  • StudentsEncourages schools to add quantum-themed STEM activities, which may increase student interest in related careers.
  • Potential benefitSignals U.S. support for quantum competitiveness, which could strengthen industry and research partnerships.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenIs largely symbolic and creates no direct funding, regulatory, or programmatic changes.
  • Federal agenciesCould be perceived as federal involvement in education content and priorities.
  • Potential burdenMay divert limited classroom time or attention without additional educational resources.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives stress equity and public funding; conservatives stress local control.
Progressive85%

Likely positive about promoting STEM access and public science literacy.

Views quantum education as a tool to expand opportunity if paired with equitable outreach and public investment.

Would stress inclusion, workforce diversity, and public funding to make benefits broad-based.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Generally favorable because it is symbolic and promotes STEM and competitiveness.

Sees practical value in public outreach but notes it is nonbinding and limited in scope.

Wants clarity that this does not create new mandates or significant federal costs.

Leans supportive
Conservative70%

Conditionally supportive because it promotes U.S. technological competitiveness while remaining nonbinding.

Cautious about federal messaging to schools and prefers state/local control and private-sector solutions.

Worries about potential politicization of education.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood2/100

As a chamber resolution it expresses sentiment but does not create binding law; symbolic observances rarely translate into statutory law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether a companion House resolution would be introduced or adopted
  • No cost estimate or implementation guidance included (though not necessary)
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives stress equity and public funding; conservatives stress local control.

As a chamber resolution it expresses sentiment but does not create binding law; symbolic observances rarely translate into statutory law.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly drafted commemorative resolution that appropriately confines itself to recognition, supportive language, and encouragement of educational observance with…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis