S. Res. 180 (119th)Bill Overview

A resolution designating the week of April 19 through April 27, 2025, as "National Park Week".

Simple ResolutionPublic Lands and Natural Resources|Commemorative events and holidaysOutdoor recreation
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Apr 10, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution designates the week of April 19 through April 27, 2025, as National Park Week and encourages people to visit and support the national parks. It is a nonbinding statement adopted by the Senate that does not change the law, create obligations, or require action by federal agencies. The resolution highlights the history, visitation, and economic and cultural importance of the National Park System and promotes public engagement and responsible recreation.

Passage rules

This is a Senate simple resolution adopted by the Senate alone and is not sent to the President. It is nonbinding and does not have the force of law or require House approval.

This Senate resolution designates April 19–27, 2025, as National Park Week.

It recognizes the National Park Service’s history and mission, cites visitation and economic statistics, and encourages people to responsibly visit and support U.S. national parks.

Passage0/100

Simple Senate resolutions are nonbinding and do not become law; content would be easily adopted but not converted into statute.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative Senate resolution that clearly designates a specific week as National Park Week and encourages public participation.

Contention5/100

Liberals stress conservation funding and equitable access

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governments · CommunitiesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreases public awareness of national parks, potentially boosting recreation, education, and civic engagement.
  • Local governmentsMay generate short-term local economic gains from visitor spending and tourism.
  • CommunitiesEncourages volunteerism and community support for park stewardship activities.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenMay increase visitation, causing overcrowding and visitor management challenges.
  • Potential burdenCould accelerate wear and environmental impacts in sensitive park areas.
  • Potential burdenResolution is symbolic and provides no additional funding or legal protections.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals stress conservation funding and equitable access
Progressive90%

Generally supportive as a recognition of conservation, public lands, and public access.

Would view the resolution positively but note it is symbolic and does not provide funding or stronger protections.

Leans supportive
Centrist95%

Favorable overall because the resolution is bipartisan, nonbinding, and promotes civic engagement and tourism.

Will note that it is ceremonial and watch for follow-up on funding or management implications.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Likely supportive because it honors national heritage, encourages recreation, and notes economic benefits.

May emphasize local stewardship and caution about expanding federal obligations.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

Simple Senate resolutions are nonbinding and do not become law; content would be easily adopted but not converted into statute.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether a companion House resolution was intended or necessary
  • No cost estimate provided (but none expected)
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals stress conservation funding and equitable access

Simple Senate resolutions are nonbinding and do not become law; content would be easily adopted but not converted into statute.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative Senate resolution that clearly designates a specific week as National Park Week and encourages public participation.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis