S. Res. 187 (119th)Bill Overview

A resolution celebrating the 153rd anniversary of Arbor Day.

Simple ResolutionEnvironmental Protection|Commemorative events and holidaysEnvironmental Protection
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Apr 29, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2643: 3; text: CR S2669-2670: 3)

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a non-binding statement by the Senate that recognizes April 25, 2025, as National Arbor Day, celebrates its 153rd anniversary, supports its goals, and encourages Americans to participate. It does not create new law, change federal programs, or require action by the President. It is intended to express the Senate's view and promote public awareness of tree planting and urban forestry efforts.

This Senate resolution recognizes April 25, 2025, as National Arbor Day and celebrates its 153rd anniversary.

It affirms the goals of Arbor Day, highlights the role of trees, urban forestry programs, and working forests, and encourages public participation.

The text praises sustainable forest management, the use of wood in construction, and Tree City USA participation.

Passage0/100

This is a nonbinding Senate resolution expressing sentiment; such measures do not create statutes and therefore do not become law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, well-focused commemorative resolution. It clearly states the occasion and uses conventional resolution language to recognize, celebrate, support, and encourage observance.

Contention15/100

Progressive worries emphasis on 'working forests' promotes logging.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Local governmentsEncourages volunteer tree planting, boosting local civic engagement and urban forestry activities.
  • Potential benefitRaises public awareness of trees' role in carbon sequestration and climate mitigation.
  • Local governmentsValidates and promotes the Tree City USA program, potentially increasing municipal urban forestry investments.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenResolution is symbolic and creates no binding policy, law, or funding.
  • Potential burdenLanguage emphasizing 'working forests' might be used to justify expanded logging practices.
  • Potential burdenPraising timber use risks downplaying ecological concerns or lifecycle emissions of wood products.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressive worries emphasis on 'working forests' promotes logging.
Progressive80%

Generally supportive of Arbor Day's civic and environmental aims, viewing it as a useful awareness tool.

Concerned that the resolution's emphasis on 'working forests' and harvesting could be used to justify expanded logging without stronger biodiversity protections.

Sees the measure as symbolic and would prefer that it be paired with concrete conservation funding and equity measures.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Views the resolution as a low‑cost, bipartisan recognition of a popular civic observance.

Appreciates the emphasis on stewardship and sustainable management while noting the language is symbolic and not policy‑binding.

Sees modest benefits with limited downside, but wants clarity on terms like 'sustainably managed.'

Leans supportive
Conservative95%

Likely strongly supportive as a non‑regulatory affirmation of private property stewardship and working forests.

Values the resolution's recognition of sustainably grown wood, economic uses, and local conservation efforts.

Views the measure as modest, pro‑stewardship, and respectful of state and private management.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

This is a nonbinding Senate resolution expressing sentiment; such measures do not create statutes and therefore do not become law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether any implementing federal action was intended but not specified
  • Potential minor pushback over 'working forests' and management framing
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressive worries emphasis on 'working forests' promotes logging.

This is a nonbinding Senate resolution expressing sentiment; such measures do not create statutes and therefore do not become law.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, well-focused commemorative resolution. It clearly states the occasion and uses conventional resolution language to recognize, celebrate, support…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis