S. Res. 27 (119th)Bill Overview

A resolution congratulating the North Dakota State University Bison football team for winning the 2024 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Football Championship Subdivision title.

Simple ResolutionSports and Recreation|Congressional tributesHigher education
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 15, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S196; text: CR S186-187)

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution congratulates North Dakota State University's football team for winning the 2024 NCAA Division I FCS title and commends the players, coaches, university leaders, and fans. It is a formal, ceremonial statement by the Senate recognizing the team's achievement. It does not change law, create rights, or provide funding.

Passage rules

This is a simple Senate resolution adopted by the Senate alone; it does not go to the House or the President and carries no legal force. It is a non-binding, ceremonial expression of the Senate's view.

A Senate resolution congratulating North Dakota State University (NDSU) Bison football for winning the 2024 NCAA Division I FCS championship, commending players, coaches, university leaders, and fans, and recognizing the team’s and university’s achievements.

Passage1/100

This is a simple chamber resolution expressing sentiment; it is non‑binding and not a vehicle to create law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly states its purpose and uses concise, appropriate language to convey congratulations and recognition; it properly omits implementation, funding, and oversight provisions that are not reasonably expected for this category of measure.

Contention5/100

Progressives emphasize student welfare and equity concerns (speculative)

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
States · StudentsStates · Federal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • StatesIncreases university and state visibility, potentially boosting applications and enrollment interest.
  • Potential benefitGenerates goodwill that may increase alumni donations and merchandise sales.
  • StudentsStrengthens recruiting appeal for prospective student‑athletes, possibly improving future team competitiveness.
Likely burdened
  • StatesCreates a symbolic statement with no binding legal or budgetary effect.
  • Potential burdenOccupies Senate consideration time that critics might prefer for substantive legislation.
  • Federal agenciesSingle‑institution commendations may be viewed as unequal federal attention among universities.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize student welfare and equity concerns (speculative)
Progressive85%

Likely supportive of recognizing student-athlete achievement and the university’s role.

Views the resolution as a benign, ceremonial commendation that highlights student success and institutional excellence.

Leans supportive
Centrist95%

Views the resolution as a harmless, bipartisan ceremonial gesture celebrating a regional accomplishment.

Sees it as appropriate recognition without policy change or budgetary impact.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Generally favorable toward celebrating state and university athletic success and local pride.

Accepts ceremonial federal recognition but may prefer limited federal involvement in symbolic acts.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood1/100

This is a simple chamber resolution expressing sentiment; it is non‑binding and not a vehicle to create law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether a companion House resolution would be introduced
  • Possible procedural objections in either chamber
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize student welfare and equity concerns (speculative)

This is a simple chamber resolution expressing sentiment; it is non‑binding and not a vehicle to create law.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly states its purpose and uses concise, appropriate language to convey congratulations and recognition; it pro…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis