Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3405; text: CR S3404)
This resolution designates June 2025 as "Great Outdoors Month" and encourages people to enjoy outdoor recreation responsibly. It expresses the Senate's support for outdoor recreation and notes related economic and health benefits. It is a statement by the Senate only, does not create new law, and does not require action by the President or federal agencies.
This is a Senate simple resolution adopted by that chamber alone; simple resolutions do not go to the President, are not legally binding, and are typically approved by a majority of the chamber that considers them.
This Senate resolution designates June 2025 as "Great Outdoors Month." It cites data on the size and growth of the outdoor recreation economy, references relevant statutes (the Outdoor Recreation Jobs and Economic Impact Act of 2016 and the Great American Outdoors Act), and encourages all people to responsibly participate in outdoor recreation during June 2025 and year-round.
The resolution is ceremonial and does not authorize spending or change existing law.
Because this is a short, nonbinding, ceremonial Senate resolution designating a commemorative month and encouraging activity, it faces very little substantive opposition; however, such resolutions do not create binding law and often do not require or undergo bicameral passage and Presidential signature, so the concept of 'becoming law' is largely inapplicable—if the metric is interpreted as passage/official adoption in the originating chamber, likelihood is very high, but as formal statutory law the probability is effectively low.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly states its purpose, cites supporting context, and uses standard, unambiguous operative language to designate a month and encourage participation.
Degree of satisfaction with the bill's purely symbolic nature: liberals want substantive follow-up on conservation and equity while conservatives emphasize ensuring no new federal spending or authority.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Degree of satisfaction with the bill's purely symbolic nature: liberals want substantive follow-up on conservation and equity while conservatives emphasize ensuring no new federal spending or authority.
A mainstream liberal would view this as a broadly positive, low-cost recognition of outdoor recreation, public lands, and the outdoor economy.
They would welcome attention to public lands and the economic and health benefits of outdoor activity but note the resolution is symbolic and does not address climate mitigation, environmental protection, or equity of access.
They would likely want follow-on policy or funding to strengthen conservation, improve access for underserved communities, and support frontline workers and small businesses.
A centrist/moderate would see this resolution as a noncontroversial, bipartisan acknowledgement of the economic and social value of outdoor recreation.
They would appreciate the data citations and the connection to existing laws (e.g., Great American Outdoors Act) and view the measure as a low-cost way to promote recreation and rural economies.
At the same time, they would note it has no substantive policy or budgetary effect and would look to whether it is paired with practical follow-on actions.
A mainstream conservative would generally view the resolution favorably as a celebration of outdoor recreation, small businesses in rural areas, and national heritage.
They would note it is purely ceremonial and does not create new regulatory burdens or authorize spending, which reduces typical conservative objections.
Some conservatives might caution that such messaging should not be used to justify new federal programs or expanded federal control over lands.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Because this is a short, nonbinding, ceremonial Senate resolution designating a commemorative month and encouraging activity, it faces very little substantive opposition; however, such resolutions do not create binding law and often do not require or undergo bicameral passage and Presidential signature, so the concept of 'becoming law' is largely inapplicable—if the metric is interpreted as passage/official adoption in the originating chamber, likelihood is very high, but as formal statutory law the probability is effectively low.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Degree of satisfaction with the bill's purely symbolic nature: liberals want substantive follow-up on conservation and equity while conserv…
Because this is a short, nonbinding, ceremonial Senate resolution designating a commemorative month and encouraging activity, it faces very…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly states its purpose, cites supporting context, and uses standard, unambiguous operative language to designat…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.