S. Res. 34 (119th)Bill Overview

A resolution congratulating the Washington University in St. Louis Bears women's soccer team for winning the 2024 NCAA Division III Women's Soccer Championship.

Simple ResolutionSports and Recreation|Congressional tributesHigher education
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 23, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S329; text: CR S341)

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a Senate simple resolution that formally congratulates the Washington University in St. Louis Bears women's soccer team for winning the 2024 Division III championship. It expresses the sense and recognition of the Senate but does not create laws, change federal policy, or establish legal rights. The resolution was considered and agreed to by the Senate and asks the Secretary of the Senate to send copies to school officials. It is ceremonial and intended to record the Senate's commendation and notify the team and university.

Passage rules

Simple resolutions are acted on by the single chamber that issues them; this Senate resolution was considered and agreed to in the Senate and does not go to the House or the President. It is nonbinding and used for official statements, honors, or internal Senate matters.

This Senate resolution congratulates the Washington University in St.

Louis Bears women’s soccer team for winning the 2024 NCAA Division III Women’s Soccer Championship.

It recounts the team’s 23–0–2 record, individual and coaching awards, and thanks university staff and fans.

Passage0/100

Text is a non-binding Senate resolution for recognition; such measures do not create laws.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, conventionally drafted commemorative Senate resolution that clearly states the facts to be recognized, issues straightforward commendations, and includes a simple administrative transmittal instruction.

Contention5/100

All personas broadly supportive; disagreement is only about symbolic Senate time use

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
StudentsLocal governments

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • StudentsRaises university and athletic program visibility, potentially improving student and athlete recruitment.
  • Potential benefitBoosts alumni engagement and may increase philanthropic interest and donor support for the university.
  • StudentsEnhances morale and recognition for players, coaches, staff, and the student body.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenAllocating Senate attention to ceremonial recognitions may be seen as using floor time for symbolic purposes.
  • Local governmentsProvides no funding, legal change, or policy effect despite invoking federal recognition for a local institution.
  • Potential burdenSuch recognitions could increase frequency of similar acknowledgments, adding to congressional workload.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

All personas broadly supportive; disagreement is only about symbolic Senate time use
Progressive90%

Overall supportive; views the resolution as a positive recognition of women’s athletics and student achievement.

Sees symbolic value for Title IX visibility and campus community morale, though notes it is ceremonial and not a policy action.

Leans supportive
Centrist100%

Generally favorable; sees the resolution as routine, low-cost, bipartisan recognition of local accomplishment.

Views it as appropriate Senate ceremonial business but notes opportunity costs of floor time could be raised in principle.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Likely supportive of honoring hard work and community values, but some conservatives might question use of Senate time for ceremonial items.

Generally sees no policy harm and appreciates support for athletics.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

Text is a non-binding Senate resolution for recognition; such measures do not create laws.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether House action is relevant or necessary
  • Absence of formal cost estimate (administrative only)
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

All personas broadly supportive; disagreement is only about symbolic Senate time use

Text is a non-binding Senate resolution for recognition; such measures do not create laws.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, conventionally drafted commemorative Senate resolution that clearly states the facts to be recognized, issues straightforward commendations, and include…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis