S. Res. 35 (119th)Bill Overview

A resolution honoring the 100th anniversary of Nellie Tayloe Ross becoming the first female elected as the Governor of a State in the United States.

Simple ResolutionGovernment Operations and Politics|Commemorative events and holidaysElections, voting, political campaign regulation
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 24, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S372)

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a formal statement by the U.S. Senate honoring Nellie Tayloe Ross on the 100th anniversary of her inauguration as the first woman elected governor in the United States. It does not create law or require action by the House of Representatives or the President; it records the Senate's recognition and encourages citizens to join the observance. The resolution is non-binding and serves as an official commemoration of her legacy.

This Senate resolution honors the 100th anniversary of Nellie Tayloe Ross’s inauguration as the first woman elected governor of a U.S. state (Wyoming, January 5, 1925).

It praises her leadership on banking reform, public health, and education, calls her legacy inspiring to women, and asks citizens to observe January 2025 in commemoration.

The resolution is ceremonial and nonbinding.

Passage90/100

Very high chance of Senate adoption and public observance; purely ceremonial and historically uncontroversial. Not a binding statute.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative Senate resolution that clearly states and accomplishes its narrow purpose—honoring the 100th anniversary of Nellie Tayloe Ross's inauguration as the first female elected governor—using the customary, concise language and mechanisms for such resolutions.

Contention8/100

Progressives prefer linkage to concrete gender-equity actions

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitFormally recognizes a historic milestone in women's political leadership and raises public awareness.
  • Potential benefitEncourages interest in civic history and education about early women officeholders.
  • Potential benefitMay inspire women and girls to pursue leadership and public service roles.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenHas no legal force and does not change rights, regulations, or budgets.
  • Potential burdenUses Senate time for a ceremonial resolution rather than substantive legislative matters.
  • Potential burdenProvides symbolic acknowledgment without creating programs to address women's representation gaps.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives prefer linkage to concrete gender-equity actions
Progressive95%

Likely welcomes the resolution as recognition of a milestone in women's political history and a useful public-education moment.

May wish the resolution connected with concrete gender equity policies or broader inclusion efforts.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Likely views the resolution as a low-cost, bipartisan recognition of a historical first that fosters national unity and civic awareness.

Sees it as appropriate for the Senate but notes its strictly ceremonial nature.

Leans supportive
Conservative85%

Likely supports honoring an individual state leader and a historic first, viewing it as a patriotic recognition of public service.

Might prefer the resolution remain apolitical and focused on individual achievement rather than identity politics.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood90/100

Very high chance of Senate adoption and public observance; purely ceremonial and historically uncontroversial. Not a binding statute.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Senate floor schedule and availability for unanimous consent
  • Potential single-senator objections delaying consideration
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives prefer linkage to concrete gender-equity actions

Very high chance of Senate adoption and public observance; purely ceremonial and historically uncontroversial. Not a binding statute.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative Senate resolution that clearly states and accomplishes its narrow purpose—honoring the 100th anniversary of Nellie Tayloe Ross's in…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis