S. Res. 40 (119th)Bill Overview

A resolution commemorating the 80th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz extermination camp in Nazi-occupied Poland and International Holocaust Remembrance Day.

Simple ResolutionInternational Affairs|Commemorative events and holidaysConflicts and wars
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Jan 27, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S387-388; text: CR S398)

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a non-binding Senate resolution that officially commemorates the 80th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz and International Holocaust Remembrance Day. It expresses the Senate's views, honors survivors and victims, and calls on Americans to remember the Holocaust and to combat antisemitism and intolerance. It does not create or change any law and applies only as the Senate's statement of position.

This Senate resolution commemorates January 27, 2025 as the 80th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz and International Holocaust Remembrance Day.

It recounts historical facts about the Holocaust and Auschwitz, cites recent increases in antisemitic incidents, honors survivors, calls for remembrance, education, tolerance, and recommits to combatting antisemitism.

Passage0/100

As a Senate simple resolution it expresses the Senate's view but does not create binding law; not a vehicle for enactment.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative resolution: it clearly states its purpose and historical facts, invokes existing international and national memorial frameworks, and issues rhetorical calls to remembrance and opposition to antisemitism without creating legal obligations or requiring resources.

Contention10/100

Debate over symbolism versus concrete funding and programs

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · CommunitiesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreases public awareness and education about the Holocaust and its historical victims.
  • Federal agenciesSignals federal moral leadership against antisemitism, potentially shaping public discourse.
  • CommunitiesHonors survivors publicly, which may encourage community support and recognition efforts.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenIs purely symbolic and creates no legal obligations, funding, or regulatory changes.
  • Potential burdenMay be criticized as performative if not paired with concrete measures for prevention.
  • Potential burdenDoes not itself address root causes of antisemitism or mechanisms to reduce hate crimes.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Debate over symbolism versus concrete funding and programs
Progressive90%

Likely strongly supportive of Holocaust remembrance, survivor honor, and anti-antisemitism commitments.

Some on the liberal left may want stronger, intersectional anti-hate language and concrete funding for education and survivor services.

A few may worry the resolution could be politicized by linking remembrance to recent Middle East events (noted in the text).

Leans supportive
Centrist95%

Generally supportive: views the resolution as a noncontroversial, bipartisan statement honoring victims and condemning antisemitism.

Sees value in education and commemoration but will note it is largely symbolic and may call for follow-up measures and clarity on statistics cited.

Leans supportive
Conservative95%

Likely strongly supportive of commemoration and the strong condemnation of antisemitism included in the text.

Some conservatives may emphasize the importance of confronting antisemitic violence and may welcome references to recent terrorist attacks as context.

A few may caution against any federal overreach in implementing programs.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

As a Senate simple resolution it expresses the Senate's view but does not create binding law; not a vehicle for enactment.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether a companion House resolution will be introduced and considered
  • Potential politicization of recent incident statistics mentioned
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Debate over symbolism versus concrete funding and programs

As a Senate simple resolution it expresses the Senate's view but does not create binding law; not a vehicle for enactment.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative resolution: it clearly states its purpose and historical facts, invokes existing international and national memorial fram…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis