S. Res. 92 (119th)Bill Overview

A resolution designating February 16, 2025, as "National Elizabeth Peratrovich Day".

Simple ResolutionNative Americans|Commemorative events and holidaysCongressional tributes
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Feb 24, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1316; text: CR S1316)

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a nonbinding Senate measure that formally names February 16, 2025, as National Elizabeth Peratrovich Day. It recognizes Elizabeth Peratrovich's life and civil rights work and calls on people and Members of Congress to observe the day. It does not create legal rights or change federal law; it is a statement of the Senate's view and encouragement.

Passage rules

This is a Senate simple resolution adopted by the Senate alone; it does not go to the House or the President and does not have the force of law.

This Senate resolution designates February 16, 2025, as National Elizabeth Peratrovich Day.

It recounts Peratrovich’s leadership in securing Alaska’s Anti-Discrimination Act of 1945 and her advocacy for Alaska Natives.

The resolution calls on Americans to observe the day, remember Peratrovich and other civil rights leaders, and continue work toward equality for Alaska Natives and Native Americans.

Passage70/100

Content is symbolic and broadly agreeable, so congressional approval or equivalent recognition is likely; note S. Res. is nonbinding and not a statute.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly states its purpose, specifies the date and name of the observance, and issues general calls to observe and commemorate Elizabeth Peratrovich.

Contention10/100

Liberal emphasizes civil-rights importance and need for policy follow-through.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitElevates public recognition of Elizabeth Peratrovich and her role in U.S. civil rights history.
  • Potential benefitEncourages educational events and historical programming about Native American civil rights and Alaska Natives.
  • Federal agenciesSymbolically affirms federal respect for Alaska Native and Native American civil rights and cultural contributions.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenResolution is purely ceremonial and creates no legal rights, remedies, or mandates.
  • Federal agenciesNo dedicated federal funding accompanies the designation, so implementation relies on voluntary actions.
  • Federal agenciesFederal observance duplicates an existing State of Alaska holiday, offering limited new practical effect.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes civil-rights importance and need for policy follow-through.
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive as recognition of Indigenous civil-rights leadership and anti-discrimination history.

Will see the designation as a valuable educational and commemorative step.

Will note, however, that symbolism must be matched by substantive policy for Native communities.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Generally supportive as a bipartisan, non-controversial commemoration.

Views it as appropriate recognition of historical fact with limited legal effect.

Would emphasize clarity on costs and prefer accompanying educational outreach rather than new mandates.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Likely supportive because the resolution honors a historic anti-discrimination leader and is symbolic.

Will emphasize preserving limited federal action and deferring implementation details to states.

May caution against federalizing observances or creating expectations of spending.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood70/100

Content is symbolic and broadly agreeable, so congressional approval or equivalent recognition is likely; note S. Res. is nonbinding and not a statute.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether House will adopt a companion or concurrent measure
  • Whether sponsors seek a binding joint resolution or presidential proclamation
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes civil-rights importance and need for policy follow-through.

Content is symbolic and broadly agreeable, so congressional approval or equivalent recognition is likely; note S. Res. is nonbinding and no…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly states its purpose, specifies the date and name of the observance, and issues general calls to observe and…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis