Gabe Amo headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Rhode Island District 1
Born
December 11, 1987
Age 38
Phone
(202) 225-4911
Office
1119 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Rhode Island District 1

Gabe Amo

Gabriel Felix Kofi Amo is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for Rhode Island's 1st congressional district since 2023.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 553
Yes43%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Gabe Amo headshot
Gabe Amo
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratRhode Island District 1
SoupScore
Gabe's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 21 sponsored · 120 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Mass layoffs and Social Security office closures at won’t improve efficiency — they’ll hurt beneficiaries, full stop. Donald Trump said he wouldn’t touch Social Security — he lied.
Great to meet with NASN! In schools across RI, nurses like Amy are essential in supporting mental health, offering care, compassion, and early intervention.   I'm proud to support efforts that would recognize their work & grow the pipeline of nursing students to schools in our community.
Trump’s illegal decision to reduce the reimbursement rate for indirect research costs would have a devastating effect on RI research institutions that rely on NIH funding to carry out their life saving work.
$230 billion in potential cuts to SNAP + $880 billion in potential cuts to Medicaid = $1.1 trillion in tax giveaways to the top 1%   We can't — and won't — stay silent while they hurt ordinary Americans to give to the rich.
Because it's the clearest example of how Republicans are looking to gut programs that feed and care for everyday Americans in order to cut taxes for the richest few.
After 3 surgeries, a blood clot, infection & being hospitalized for over a week, the moment I was discharged I rushed to the airport so I could get on a plane to DC & vote NO on Republicans’ disastrous budget plan. Rep. Pettersen traveled from Colorado with her newborn son so she could vote NO. 🧵
Tonight, 217 Republicans voted to betray the needs of ordinary Americans by shoveling over $1 trillion in tax giveaways to the richest 1%. Instead of working to lower costs, Republicans are charging full steam ahead to abandon their constituents and cut health care and nutrition programs.
Before every vote, I ask myself two questions: who does this benefit? Who does this hurt?   Today, the answers are clear. This Republican plan would benefit the richest 1% and hurt families struggling to make ends meet by taking away Medicaid & nutritional assistance.
I joined @alivitali.bsky.social to discuss how listening to the people we serve is central to preventing Republicans from cutting programs & making Americans poorer and sicker.
After hearing the impact on community health centers & seniors last week, I’m even more clear about how the GOP budget resolution would hurt Rhode Islanders.
Late last night, the GOP prevented the House from voting on two of my amendments to their Budget Scheme: 1️⃣ Prevent cuts ➡️ programs feeding families & school children 2️⃣ Protect Medicaid ➡️provides health coverage to 72 million Americans. What a betrayal of working people for billionaires.
Trump and Musk’s cruel crusade continues to create chaos and confusion in our community. I spoke with three Rhode Islanders who worked at USDA that can no longer help farmers and RI cities & towns because of this administration’s shortsighted decisions.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
553 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-03Election of the SpeakerNOT_VOTINGJohnson (LA)
2025-01-03Call by StatesPRESENTPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 12