Angela D. Alsobrooks headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Maryland
Born
February 23, 1971
Age 55
Phone
(202) 224-4524
Office
374 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Maryland

Angela D. Alsobrooks

Angela Deneece Alsobrooks is an American lawyer and politician serving since 2025 as the junior United States senator from Maryland. A member of the Democratic Party, she served from 2011 to 2018 as state's attorney for Prince George's County and from 2018 to 2024 as county executive of Prince George's County. She was Prince George's County's first female county executive and the first Black female county executive in Maryland history.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 830
Yes30%
No68%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Angela D. Alsobrooks headshot
Angela D. Alsobrooks
U.S. SenatorDemocratMaryland
SoupScore
Angela D.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 30 sponsored · 235 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

I’m heartbroken by the horrific attack at the Islamic Center of San Diego. Muslim communities should be able to worship freely and safely without fear of violence or hate. We cannot stay silent in the face of Islamophobia. My prayers are with the victims and their families.
Great meeting with our 2026 Spring Senate Page, David, to hear about his experience serving in the U.S. Senate. David’s dedication to leadership and public service is inspiring. With young leaders like him stepping up to serve, Maryland’s future looks bright.
Families are already struggling with rising costs and should not be forced to pay junk “convenience fees” just to pay their bills. That’s why I filed a resolution to restore CFPB protections against these abusive pay-to-play fees and stand up for working families and consumers.
Maryland’s diversity is our strength, and our state is better because of Marylanders of every background, faith, culture, and lived experience. Hate and bigotry have no place here. I stand with Del. Wu and Maryland’s AANHPI community.
I voted YES on @merkley.senate.gov’s War Powers Res. and while I hoped my Republican colleagues would vote to help Americans struggling with rising costs, they did not. To be clear, Republicans do not care about how much this war costs, they only care about appeasing the President.
Too many hardworking Americans come face to face with barriers preventing them from creating and building generational wealth. I joined Tiffany Haddish at the Milken Institute Global Conference to talk about how we can create pathways for true upward economic mobility.
Families are stretched thin — raising kids, caring for aging parents, and facing rising costs. It shouldn’t be this hard to care for loved ones. Looking forward to tomorrow’s Senate Aging Committee hearing and learning from those working on these challenges daily.
As gas prices rise and the cost of living climbs because of this reckless war, this Admin is asking taxpayers to spend another $1 BILLION on a ballroom. Hardworking Americans are struggling to get by while this White House treats taxpayer dollars like Monopoly money.
Republicans proposed $1 billion in taxpayer dollars to secure Trump ballroom
RFK Jr. is not fit to lead during a public health crisis. He gutted the very teams that respond to threats like Hantavirus, and left the CDC leaderless. Americans deserve answers from HHS and the Secretary immediately.
Title: Hantavirus Response Shows How Trump Cuts Have Compromised U.S. Preparedness
Subtitle: The Trump administration has slashed funding for infectious disease research and has far fewer employees, including disease detectives, to respond to outbreaks.
A year ago, I called on RFK Jr. to resign because our nation's public health should be guided by science, honesty, and trust. One year later, I stand by that call wholeheartedly. Families deserve facts over misinformation and leaders who protect, not jeopardize, our health.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
830 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 17 / 17