PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Tammy Baldwin headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Wisconsin
Born
February 11, 1962
Age 64
Phone
(202) 224-5653
Office
141 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Wisconsin

Tammy Baldwin

Tammy Suzanne Green Baldwin is an American politician and lawyer serving since 2013 as the junior United States senator from Wisconsin. A member of the Democratic Party, she has also served as the secretary of the Senate Democratic Caucus since 2017. Baldwin has been the dean of the United States congressional delegation from Wisconsin since 2023, when Representative Ron Kind retired.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 783
Yes30%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @SenatorBaldwinFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Tammy Baldwin headshot
Tammy Baldwin
U.S. SenatorDemocratWisconsin
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 43 sponsored · 268 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govFeb 18(source)
We need to give working families some breathing room. My bill would do just that – taking on big drug companies and lowering the out-of-pocket costs of their prescription drugs.   Families want lower health care costs and that’s what I’m fighting for.
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govFeb 16(source)
I’m all for making our government more efficient but firing nurses and pharmacists who keep families healthy, disease experts who protect us from the next pandemic, and scientists finding cures for cancer is not efficient — it’s dangerous. apnews.com/article/trum...
HHS is losing thousands of workers under Trump administration probationary job cuts
Department of Health and Human Services officials expected most of the agency’s roughly 5,200 probationary employees to be fired.
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govFeb 14(source)
Child care. Firefighters. Cops. Entire communities are still figuring out if this Administration is going to illegally cut their funding. We are fighting to make sure the President doesn’t take it from you.
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govFeb 13(source)
Donald Trump and Elon Musk have made it clear as day. They need to find room in the budget to give big corporations and their billionaire friends a tax break. And the American people are going to pay for it.
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govFeb 12(source)
If President Trump thinks he can just ignore Congress and fund the programs he likes, does that mean he can just cut off Medicare in the Blue States? What about just funding the VA in Red States? This is not a Kingdom, there are three branches of government in this country.
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govFeb 11(source)
I’ve spoken with Shanon and William directly, and their son Cole should still be with them. My heart still breaks for them but look, this should never happen. That’s why I’ve been fighting to hold major drug companies' feet to the fire and lower the cost of inhalers.
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govFeb 10(source)
Cutting funding for cancer research won’t help families, it will hurt them and the progress we’ve made to find lifesaving cures. Make no mistake, slashing this critical funding will mean people won’t get the treatments they need and workers will lose their jobs.
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govFeb 9(source)
Wall Street investors should not be paying LESS in taxes than Wisconsin firefighters, teachers, and small business owners. It’s as simple as that. My bill would close this tax loophole and ensure the wealthiest Americans pay their fair share. civicmedia.us/news/2025/02...
Tammy Baldwin Proposes Legislation To Close Carried Interest Tax Loophole
U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., has introduced new legislation that seeks to close a tax loophole pertaining to carried interest that currently allows some investors to pay less income tax.
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govFeb 9(source)
Illegally cutting funding that families rely on for finding cures for diseases like cancer, Alzheimer's, and diabetes will have dire consequences. It means less hope for ending diseases that plague every family. People will likely be fired. This is wrong and we are fighting back.
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govFeb 7(source)
Look, I have a very hard time believing the richest man in the world is fighting for hard-working Wisconsinites, not himself and his billionaire friends. He has no business accessing Americans' social security information. www.semafor.com/article/02/0...
DOGE follows longtime Musk pattern — and turns attention to Social Security Administration
There are differing views among those close to the Elon Musk-led group about exactly how far to go with cuts.
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govFeb 6(source)
Lastly, I’ll never shy away from standing up for our workers & our Made in Wisconsin economy. I will stand up to big corporations who don’t respect their employees, China when they undermine our businesses, & any President who doesn’t work with me to keep things here in the U.S. #MadeInUSA. 🇺🇲 (7/7)
← Newer postsPosts page 30Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
783 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-04—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Bill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESNO✕↔Amendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESNO✕↔Amendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 16 / 16