Christopher A. Coons headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Delaware
Born
September 9, 1963
Age 63
Phone
(202) 224-5042
Office
218 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Delaware

Christopher A. Coons

Voting Record — 921
Yes33%
No61%
Present0%
Not Voting6%
Party align94%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Christopher A. Coons headshot
Christopher A. Coons
U.S. SenatorDemocratDelaware
SoupScore
Christopher A.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 66 sponsored · 422 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Any negotiations over Ukraine's future must include Ukraine. After years of fighting for their freedom, the Ukrainian people deserve a say in their country's future. A deal that rewards Putin's aggression isn't a lasting peace.
Trump wants to punish reporters for stories he doesn’t like. Grateful that @knightcolumbia.org & @yalelawschool-yls.bsky.social's Media Freedom & Information Access Clinic are fighting back, because the president doesn’t get to decide what the press can report or what the public has a right to know.
Strong turnout at the polls has secured wins for democracy in several recent elections. In Hungary, despite sixteen years of Viktor Orban’s heavy-handed rule, he was defeated in elections last April.
Trump is trying to force Ukraine's surrender. That would be a tragedy and a huge strategic error. I'll be damned if it happens while I have anything to say about it.
Today would be a good day to lower the cost of health care by reversing Trump’s Medicaid cuts and bringing back the ACA tax credits that kept care affordable for millions of Americans.
Trump’s reckless war with Iran is costing the average American household at least $1,200, with no end in sight. How much longer will Trump make Americans foot the bill for his own mistakes?
A military-grade weapon designed to inflict intense pain has no place in immigration enforcement, and the Pentagon has no business testing weapons for this purpose. Secretary Hegseth needs to explain why the military is using resources on American streets.
Trump's Department of War has reportedly authorized the DHS to test using a heat ray that burns human skin at the southern border.
Artificial intelligence has enormous potential to improve our lives, but Americans cannot simply trust that technology companies will police themselves. When companies ask us to trust them, my response is simple: Show us.
Putin is a killer and a thug, murdering Ukrainian children, dropping bombs on neighborhoods, and tearing families apart. Calling him a humanitarian is like calling Witkoff qualified or capable of doing this job. What are we doing here?
Top Trump Aide Steve Witkoff, to Vladimir Putin: "You talk so much about Trump being a humanitarian, you are a humanitarian also, sir. I salute you, and I commend you."
Elon Musk shouldn’t have the power to influence the outcome of a war with the flip of a switch. Yet he and Trump seem determined to put their finger on the scale for Putin.
Starlink is a key lifeline for Ukraine. Now, its service has been slowed, making it harder for Ukrainians to defend themselves against Russian attacks. We need answers from the Trump administration. Putin’s aggression shouldn’t be rewarded while Ukrainians pay the price.
This is horrific. The cruelty of Trump's immigration agenda has led to at least 47 people dying in ICE custody under this administration. We urgently need increased oversight and accountability for Trump's immigration enforcement, including ICE.
Tracy and her wife saw their health insurance premiums jump 268%, forcing them to choose between paying $3K a month or taking a chance on a plan with a $24K deductible. Days later, an ER visit left them with a massive bill.
Trump is weaponizing our justice system to interfere in free and fair elections: targeting his political opponents, pressuring states to hand over voter rolls, and sending his Attorney General to campaign for Republicans.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
921 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-07-28H.R. 5334 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (86-12, 3/5 majority required)
2026-07-28—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-47)
2026-07-27—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43)
2026-07-23—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (49-44)
2026-07-23—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (48-47)
2026-07-23S.J. Res. 180 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 180YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-49)
2026-07-22—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2026-07-22—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-44)
2026-07-22—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (62-36)
2026-07-22—End debateNOT_VOTINGNO—Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-35)
2026-07-22—Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNO—Nomination Confirmed (49-46)
2026-07-21—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-48)
2026-07-20—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (43-40)
2026-07-16S.J. Res. 198 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-50)
2026-07-16—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-48)
2026-07-15—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-46)
2026-07-15—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2026-07-14S. 4784 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-07-14—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-45)
2026-07-13—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (46-44)
2026-06-24S.J. Res. 185 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-50)
2026-06-24—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-24S.J. Res. 196 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-52)
2026-06-24—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2026-06-24—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-44)
2026-06-24—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-24—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2026-06-24—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-23H. Con. Res. 86 (119th)Accept House changesYESYES✓Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48)
2026-06-23—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (67-30)
2026-06-22H.R. 6644 (119th)Accept House changesYESYES✓Motion Agreed to (85-5)
2026-06-18—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (48-39)
2026-06-18H.R. 6644 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-8, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-17S. Res. 616 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.Res. 616YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (44-50)
2026-06-17—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-41)
2026-06-17—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (55-39)
2026-06-17—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-41)
2026-06-16H.R. 6644 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (87-8)
2026-06-16S.J. Res. 172 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 172YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-48)
2026-06-16S.J. Res. 190 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-48)
2026-06-15—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (48-43)
2026-06-11—End debateNOT_VOTINGNO—Cloture Motion Agreed to (47-43)
2026-06-11—Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNO—Nomination Confirmed (49-44)
2026-06-10—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-44)
2026-06-10—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-44)
2026-06-10—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45)
2026-06-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-46)
2026-06-08—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Budgetary Discipline Re: Lee Amdt. No. 5804)NONO✓Motion Rejected (50-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Motion (Wyden Motion to Commit S. 2 to the Committee on the Judiciary with Instructions)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (48-51)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 2 / 19Next →