Howard Lutnick let the American people down, putting our national security at risk by allowing this company, Megaspeed, to access advanced AI chips. Lutnick has a lot to answer to.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Delaware
Christopher A. Coons
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 921
Yes33%
No61%
Present0%
Not Voting6%
Party align94%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Christopher A. Coons
U.S. SenatorDemocratDelaware
SoupScore
Christopher A.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 66 sponsored · 422 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
@warren.senate.gov and I are demanding that the Trump Administration preserve all records related to NVIDIA’s AI chip exports to China and the reported Chinese spy operation.
We need answers. www.wsj.com/politics/pol...
NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang has spent years lobbying Trump to allow advanced AI chip sales to China. Now, serious questions are emerging about his ties to an alleged Chinese spy and what Trump knew. Congress needs answers, and Americans deserve better national security protections.
I'm not interested in the salacious details of NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's private life. I'm very interested in the national security threat posed by his push to export advanced AI chips to China, and why Trump ignored it.
Trump promised cheaper gas. Ask yourself if he delivered the next time you’re filling up your tank.
There's a price tag on Trump's agenda, and it's getting steeper by the day. We need to lower costs now.
US inflation rose more than expected last month, adding to the strain on households already stretched by the high cost of everyday expenses. https://cnn.it/4ix9uRZ
Elon Musk, Pete Hegseth, and anyone else who played a role in cutting off Ukraine's ability to defend itself must answer for it. Congress must get to the bottom of this.
This election made clear how deeply unpopular Trump's immigration agenda is. Yet he's doubling down by elevating Stephen Miller, the chief architect of that agenda.
Reposted bySenator Chris Coons
Trump gave a half dozen justifications for the Iran war and never explained any of them to Congress or the American people.
Sen. @coons.senate.gov wants answers: “Does President Trump have a plan to get us out of it and lower the costs at the pump?”
I’m pushing to investigate Jensen Huang and Nvidia to determine whether our national security was compromised. We need answers about the relationship between AI billionaires and the Trump administration, who's making these decisions, and who's really got their hand on the wheel.
Trump changes his mind on a dime. He'll praise someone on Monday, fire them on Tuesday, and pretend he never knew them on Wednesday.
I'm not interested in investigating people just because I don't like them. I want to investigate them because I suspect they've put our national security at risk, they've been breaking the law, and they are lying to the American people.
Secretary Hegseth played a central role in an ill-conceived, badly executed war in Iran. Americans are paying the price. If the president doesn’t remove him, Congress will.
The American people are begging the White House to focus on lowering costs, but the best Trump can do is "more Stephen Miller and the culture of cruelty." He just doesn’t get it.
Delaware families are sitting at the kitchen table doing painful math as health care premiums rise. Parents shouldn't have to put off care because Republicans made it unaffordable. We should vote ASAP to restore the ACA tax credits and undo Trump’s draconian Medicaid cuts.
When I’m back in Washington on Monday, I know exactly what we need to do: end the war in Iran, scrap these senseless tariffs, and reverse the devastating health care cuts. That’s how we start making life more affordable for Americans.
If Trump is serious about working with Democrats, he can start by ending his tariff war and bringing down costs for American families. But whether he works with us or not, we're going to keep fighting to lower costs, make health care more affordable, and deliver for the American people.
Trump is giving the oil and gas industry a free pass to pollute while American families pay the price. We can support American energy production without abandoning basic safeguards that protect our climate and our health.
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History921 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
921 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-12 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-26) |
| 2026-11-12 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-27) |
| 2026-11-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (49-27) |
| 2026-11-12 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-27) |
| 2026-11-10 | H.R. 2347 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (62-21) |
| 2026-11-09 | H.R. 2347 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (73-25, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (47-41) |
| 2026-09-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2026-09-30 | H.R. 9340 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (57-43, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-30 | H.R. 7008 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-29 | S. Res. 852 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.Res. 852 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-51) |
| 2026-09-29 | S.J. Res. 197 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-51) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (77-22) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Amendment Rejected (42-54, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (1-94) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (96-1) |
| 2026-09-24 | H. Con. Res. 89 (119th) | Accept House changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-09-24 | S. 4668 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (74-25, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-24 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (77-23) |
| 2026-09-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2026-09-22 | S. 4668 (119th) | End debate | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (70-21, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-22 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-43) |
| 2026-09-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-45) |
| 2026-09-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2026-09-17 | S. 4668 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (77-22) |
| 2026-09-15 | S. 4668 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (74-24, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-15 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2026-09-14 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (47-46) |
| 2026-08-08 | S. 5271 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-49) |
| 2026-08-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-49) |
| 2026-08-08 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (90-6, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-08 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (61-32) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (91-6, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-07 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (86-11, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Amendment Rejected (32-64) |
| 2026-08-05 | S.J. Res. 187 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-50) |
| 2026-08-05 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2026-08-03 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (89-4, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-30 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Resolution Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 181 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 181 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 199 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-07-29 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2026-07-29 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-12) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 19Next →