Reposted bySenator Chris Coons
Senator @coons.senate.gov on why Trump’s election threats are deadly serious:
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Delaware
Christopher A. Coons
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes33%
No62%
Present0%
Not Voting5%
Party align94%
Cross-party5%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Christopher A. Coons
U.S. SenatorDemocratDelaware
SoupScore
Christopher A.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 62 sponsored · 402 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
A government shows its values in what it chooses to fund. This one is choosing to spend millions to give ICE yet another tool for inflicting pain on people.
The last thing ICE needs is more tools for unaccountable violence.
I’m offended that Secretary Hegseth would belittle the concerns of these military families as “fake news.” They both owe these sailors and their families an apology, and if they can’t take care of the troops under their watch, they should step aside for leaders who can.
The alarming conditions aboard the USS Lincoln driving sailors to attempt to throw themselves raise serious questions about the ability of Secretary Hegseth and Acting Secretary Cao to manage America’s Navy.
President Trump says companies whose executives donated to his own campaign are now making too much money. Meanwhile, he and his family have made billions off the presidency.
He promised to drain the swamp. Instead, he’s wallowing in it.
No child can learn on an empty stomach, and no parent should have to skip dinner so their children can eat. Food assistance programs help families put food on the table when times are hard. Protecting it is both the compassionate and responsible thing to do.
Blanche has already shown us exactly where his loyalties lie—and it’s not with the law or the American people. It’s with protecting Trump’s allies and enabling unprecedented corruption at DOJ.
I voted NO.
Early this morning, Senate Republicans confirmed President Trump’s former lawyer, Todd Blanche, as Attorney General.
With measles cases at a 35-year high and cyclosporiasis spreading to 45 states, RFK Jr. is... launching a cooking show?
He should put down the spatula and try to prevent more American deaths.
www.notus.org/health-scien...
Let's be clear about what happened here: this administration tried to send an innocent man to prison for ten years, purely to soothe the president's ego.
Judge Jennifer Mascott was confirmed to serve Delaware on the Third Circuit. We already knew she wasn’t a Delawarean; apparently, she’s also a judge uninterested in her ethical obligations.
We deserve better, and I am exploring all options including making a formal complaint to the Third Circuit.
Five months into President Trump’s costly war of choice with Iran, Americans are paying more—and none of his promises have been delivered.
Of all the many reasons I’m voting NO on Todd Blanche’s nomination, this one is most important.
President Trump has turned the presidency into a family business and is making billions in ill-gotten gains. The blatant corruption is harming our global standing at a time we need it most.
Reposted bySenator Chris Coons
A vote for Todd Blanche is a vote against the Epstein Survivors.
"The Boss wants his money."
This isn't the behavior of a president; it's the behavior of a mobster running an extortion racket. www.wsj.com/politics/pol...
Todd Blanche oversaw the disastrous rollout of the Epstein files and led a redaction process that focused more on protecting President Trump than delivering justice for Jeffrey Epstein’s victims.
The AG should defend victims, the American people, and the Constitution, not just one man.
Trump and Republicans told women abortion should be “left to the states.”
Now they’re advancing Todd Blanche’s nomination, who wants it banned in every single one.
Don’t listen to what they say—watch what they do.
Blanche presided over one of the most corrupt actions of the most corrupt administration in history—its $1.8 billion weaponization slush fund to pay off J6 cop beaters and reward his political supporters. He’s not fit to be the nation’s top law enforcement official. That’s why I voted against him.
Reposted bySenator Chris Coons
Republicans are advancing Todd Blanche to be AG after he tried to implement the Trump administration’s extremely unpopular anti-weaponization fund.
Sen. @coons.senate.gov: It “might be the most brazenly corrupt and unethical thing this administration has attempted.”
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History890 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
890 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 18 / 18